Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35926990›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Factors influencing adults who participate in a physical activity coaching intervention: a theoretically informed qualitative study.

Stephen Barrett, Stephen Begg, Paul O'Halloran, Jeff Breckon, Kane Rodda, Gabrielle Barrett, Michael Kingsley

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
0.5field-weighted citation impact, top 38% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephen BarrettHealth Promotion Department, Bendigo Health Care Group, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-2505-733X
Stephen BeggHolsworth Research Initiative, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-7482-3278
Paul O'HalloranHolsworth Research Initiative, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-6495-2359
Jeff BreckonResearch and Innovation, Teesside University, Middlesbrough, North Yorkshire, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4911-9814
Kane RoddaOutpatient Rehabilitation Department, Bendigo Health Care Group, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.
Gabrielle BarrettHealth Promotion Department, Bendigo Health Care Group, Bendigo, Victoria, Australia.
Michael KingsleyHolsworth Research Initiative, La Trobe University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia M.Kingsley@latrobe.edu.au michael.kingsley@auckland.ac.nz.ORCID 0000-0002-1953-4067
La Trobe University · AUBendigo Health · AUTeesside University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveBehaviour change interventions targeting changes in physical activity (PA) can benefit by examining the underlying mechanisms that promote change. This study explored the use of the Capability, Opportunity, Motivation and Behaviour (COM-B) model and the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to code and contextualise the experiences of participants who completed a PA coaching intervention underpinned by motivational interviewing and cognitive-behavioural therapy.

designSemistructured interviews were conducted with a purposive sample of participants.

settingInterviews were conducted in a tertiary hospital in regional Victoria, Australia.

participantsEighteen participants who completed a PA coaching intervention were interviewed. The participants were recruited into the coaching intervention because they were insufficiently physically active at the time of recruitment.

resultsThirteen (72%) participants were women and the average age of participants was 54 (±5) years. Four participant themes mapped directly onto five components of the COM-B model, and ten of the TDF domains. Increases in PA were influenced by changes in motivation and psychological capability. The autonomy-supportive PA coaching intervention helped to evoke participants' own reasons (and motives) for change and influenced PA behaviours. Participants reflected on their own social and/or professional strengths, and used these skills to set appropriate PA goals and action plans. The structure of the PA coaching intervention provided clarity on session determinants and a framework from which to set an appropriate agenda. Relational components (eg, non-judgemental listening, collaboration) were continually highlighted as influential for change, and should be considered in future behaviour change intervention design.

conclusionsWe demonstrate the beneficial effect of using theory-informed behaviour change techniques, and delivering them in a style that promotes autonomy and relatedness. The views of participants should be a key consideration in the design and implementation of PA coaching interventions TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ACTRN12619000036112. Post-results analysis.

Indexed as

MentoringAdultExerciseFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedMotivationQualitative ResearchVictoriapreventive medicinepublic healthsports medicine

Identifiers

PMID35926990
PMCPMC9358940
OpenAlexW4289836629

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.