Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35926986›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2022

Scoping review to evaluate the effects of peer support on the mental health of young adults.

Jérémie Richard, Reid Rebinsky, Rahul Suresh, Serena Kubic, Adam Carter, Jasmyn E A Cunningham, Amy Ker, Kayla Williams, Mark Sorin

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06398561 (Peer-led Intervention for Individuals With Major Depression.), which is not on this map. Cited by 54 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
54citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
30.1field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06398561 nacompletednot on this mapstarted 2024, after this paper: background citation

Peer-led Intervention for Individuals With Major Depression.

TypeinterventionalSponsorUniversity of the Balearic IslandsRan2024 to 2026Enrolled81ConditionsDepressive Disorder, MajorArmsActive Patient Program
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

54 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 119 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Effect of group online-based peer support intervention on psychological distress of adolescent and young adult cancer patients: a randomized controlled trial.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2024
    Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Understanding the Impact of a Cleft Camp in Aotearoa New Zealand on Sociability, Self-Esteem, and Confidence.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2026
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jérémie RichardEducational and Counselling Psychology, McGill University, Montreal, Quebec, Canada jeremie.richard@mail.mcgill.ca.ORCID 0000-0001-9893-1353
Reid RebinskyCanadian Peer Support Network, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-5386-6284
Rahul SureshCanadian Peer Support Network, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Serena KubicCanadian Peer Support Network, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Adam CarterCanadian Peer Support Network, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Jasmyn E A CunninghamCanadian Peer Support Network, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.ORCID 0000-0002-7067-8832
Amy KerCanadian Peer Support Network, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Kayla WilliamsCanadian Peer Support Network, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
Mark SorinCanadian Peer Support Network, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.
McGill University · CAMcMaster University · CACounselling Centre for Children, Adolescents and Parents · SI

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesYoung adults report disproportionality greater mental health problems compared with the rest of the population with numerous barriers preventing them from seeking help. Peer support, defined as a form of social-emotional support offered by an individual with a shared lived experience, has been reported as being effective in improving a variety of mental health outcomes in differing populations. The objective of this scoping review is to provide an overview of the literature investigating the impact of peer support on the mental health of young adults.

designA scoping review methodology was used to identify relevant peer-reviewed articles in accordance with Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines across six databases and Google/Google Scholar. Overall, 17 eligible studies met the inclusion criteria and were included in the review.

resultsOverall, studies suggest that peer support is associated with improvements in mental health including greater happiness, self-esteem and effective coping, and reductions in depression, loneliness and anxiety. This effect appears to be present among university students, non-student young adults and ethnic/sexual minorities. Both individual and group peer support appear to be beneficial for mental health with positive effects also being present for those providing the support.

conclusionsPeer support appears to be a promising avenue towards improving the mental health of young adults, with lower barriers to accessing these services when compared with traditional mental health services. The importance of training peer supporters and the differential impact of peer support based on the method of delivery should be investigated in future research.

Indexed as

AnxietyMental HealthAdaptation, PsychologicalHumansPeer GroupSocial SupportYoung Adultadult psychiatrychild & adolescent psychiatrydepression & mood disordersmental health

Identifiers

PMID35926986
PMCPMC9358944
OpenAlexW4289783566

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.