ReviewAJNR. American journal of neuroradiology2022
Flow Diversion in the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Pragmatic Randomized Care Trial.
Review in AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 21 citations in OpenAlex.
- Flow diverter treatment for saccular unruptured intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review focussing on study quality and initial outcomes.European stroke journal · 2026Pooled it
- Efficacy and safety of flow diverters for the treatment of intracranial aneurysms: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Pooled it
- Reliability and applicability of angiographic outcome scales in WEB device-treated aneurysms: a systematic review.Neuroradiology · 2025Pooled it
- Flow Diversion for the Treatment of Distal Circulation Aneurysms: A Randomized Comparison.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2025Trial
- Efficacy and safety of flow diverter therapy for unruptured intracranial aneurysms compared to conventional endovascular therapy: a multicentre, randomised, open-label trial in South Korea.EClinicalMedicine · 2026Article
- Surpass evolve flow diverter in intracranial aneurysms: results from a single-center cohort with extended follow-up.Acta neurochirurgica · 2026Article
- MRA-based aneurysm occlusion assessment in the early phase after flow diverter treatment: a multicenter retrospective study focusing on the impact of aneurysm diameter.Neurosurgical review · 2026Article
- Flow Diversion Versus Coiling in Small and Medium-sized Unruptured Aneurysms of Proximal Anterior Circulation with Complex Anatomy: a Matched-pairs Study.Clinical neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Flow diverter treatment for saccular unruptured intracranial aneurysms: A systematic review focussing on study quality and initial outcomes.European stroke journal · 2025Article
- MRA evaluation of aneurysms treated with woven endobridge (WEB) devices or coils: an inter- and intra-observer reliability study.Neuroradiology · 2025Article
- Modeling Fibrin Accumulation on Flow-Diverting Devices for Intracranial Aneurysms.International journal for numerical methods in biomedical engineering · 2024Article
- Optimizing Photon-Counting Detector CT for Imaging Intracranial Aneurysms.AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2024Article
- Response to "Flow Diversion in the Treatment of Intracranial Aneurysms: A Pragmatic Randomized Care Trial".AJNR. American journal of neuroradiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
18 authors at 8 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
background and purposeFlow diversion is a recent endovascular treatment for intracranial aneurysms. We compared the safety and efficacy of flow diversion with the alternative standard management options. MATERIALS AND
methodsA parallel group, prerandomized, controlled, open-label pragmatic trial was conducted in 3 Canadian centers. The trial included all patients considered for flow diversion. A Web-based platform 1:1 randomly allocated patients to flow diversion or 1 of 4 alternative standard management options (coiling with/without stent placement, parent vessel occlusion, surgical clipping, or observation) as prespecified by clinical judgment. Patients ineligible for alternative standard management options were treated with flow diversion in a registry. The primary safety outcome was death or dependency (mRS > 2) at 3 months. The composite primary efficacy outcome included the core lab-determined angiographic presence of a residual aneurysm, aneurysm rupture, progressive mass effect during follow-up, or death or dependency (mRS > 2) at 3-12 months.
resultsBetween May 2011 and November 2020, three hundred twenty-three patients were recruited: Two hundred seventy-eight patients (86%) had treatment randomly allocated (139 to flow diversion and 139 to alternative standard management options), and 45 (14%) received flow diversion in the registry. Patients in the randomized trial frequently had unruptured (83%), large (52% ≥10 mm) carotid (64%) aneurysms. Death or dependency at 3 months occurred in 16/138 patients who underwent flow diversion and 12/137 patients receiving alternative standard management options (relative risk, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.65-2.69;
conclusionsFor patients with mostly unruptured, large, anterior circulation (carotid) aneurysms, flow diversion was more effective than the alternative standard management option in terms of angiographic outcome.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.