Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35926294›Full record

ReviewCurrent opinion in chemical biology2022

Chemical inhibitors of transcription-associated kinases.

Kevin C Clopper, Dylan J Taatjes

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Current opinion in chemical biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 30 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Targeting CDKs in the RNAPII transcription cycle.Nature reviews. Drug discovery · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Review
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Activation of theGenes · 2024
    Article
  18. Review
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kevin C ClopperDept. of Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA.
Dylan J TaatjesDept. of Biochemistry, University of Colorado, Boulder, CO, USA. Electronic address: taatjes@colorado.edu.
University of Colorado Boulder · US

Funding

Supplemental request for MAX-TL Ultracentrifuge and rotorR35GM139550 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI Dylan J Taatjes · 2021 to 2026
$3.8M
Mediator kinases as interferon antagonists in Down SyndromeR01AI156739 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO · PI TAATJES, DYLAN J · 2020 to 2024
$2.4M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI156739NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM139550
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transcription by RNA polymerase II (pol II) is regulated by kinases. In recent years, many selective and potent inhibitors of pol II transcription-associated kinases have been developed, and these molecules have advanced understanding of kinase function in mammalian cells. Here, we focus on chemical inhibitors of the transcription-associated kinases CDK7, CDK8, CDK9, CDK12, CDK13, and CDK19. We provide a brief overview of the function of these kinases and common activation mechanisms. We then highlight the advantages of kinase inhibitors compared with other basic research methods, and describe the caveats associated with non-selective compounds (e.g. flavopiridol). We conclude with strategies and recommendations for implementation of chemical inhibitors for experimental analysis of transcription-associated kinases.

Indexed as

Cyclin-Dependent KinasesRNA Polymerase IIAnimalsMammalsPhosphorylationCyclin-Dependent KinasesRNA Polymerase IICDK12CDK13CDK19CDK7CDK8CDK9KinaseKinase inhibitorRNA polymerase IITranscription

Identifiers

PMID35926294
PMCPMC10676000
OpenAlexW4289201254

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.