Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35925971›Full record

ArticlePloS one2022

Multi-label classification of symptom terms from free-text bilingual adverse drug reaction reports using natural language processing.

Sitthichok Chaichulee, Chissanupong Promchai, Tanyamai Kaewkomon, Chanon Kongkamol, Thammasin Ingviya, Pasuree Sangsupawanich

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Sitthichok ChaichuleeDepartment of Biomedical Sciences and Biomedical Engineering, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai, Songkhla, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-3159-7925
Chissanupong PromchaiDepartment of Pharmacy, Songklanagarind Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai, Songkhla, Thailand.
Tanyamai KaewkomonDepartment of Pharmacy, Songklanagarind Hospital, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai, Songkhla, Thailand.
Chanon KongkamolDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai, Songkhla, Thailand.
Thammasin IngviyaDepartment of Family and Preventive Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai, Songkhla, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-8894-3817
Pasuree SangsupawanichDepartment of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine, Prince of Songkla University, Hatyai, Songkhla, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Allergic reactions to medication range from mild to severe or even life-threatening. Proper documentation of patient allergy information is critical for safe prescription, avoiding drug interactions, and reducing healthcare costs. Allergy information is regularly obtained during the medical interview, but is often poorly documented in electronic health records (EHRs). While many EHRs allow for structured adverse drug reaction (ADR) reporting, a free-text entry is still common. The resulting information is neither interoperable nor easily reusable for other applications, such as clinical decision support systems and prescription alerts. Current approaches require pharmacists to review and code ADRs documented by healthcare professionals. Recently, the effectiveness of machine algorithms in natural language processing (NLP) has been widely demonstrated. Our study aims to develop and evaluate different NLP algorithms that can encode unstructured ADRs stored in EHRs into institutional symptom terms. Our dataset consists of 79,712 pharmacist-reviewed drug allergy records. We evaluated three NLP techniques: Naive Bayes-Support Vector Machine (NB-SVM), Universal Language Model Fine-tuning (ULMFiT), and Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT). We tested different general-domain pre-trained BERT models, including mBERT, XLM-RoBERTa, and WanchanBERTa, as well as our domain-specific AllergyRoBERTa, which was pre-trained from scratch on our corpus. Overall, BERT models had the highest performance. NB-SVM outperformed ULMFiT and BERT for several symptom terms that are not frequently coded. The ensemble model achieved an exact match ratio of 95.33%, a F1 score of 98.88%, and a mean average precision of 97.07% for the 36 most frequently coded symptom terms. The model was then further developed into a symptom term suggestion system and achieved a Krippendorff's alpha agreement coefficient of 0.7081 in prospective testing with pharmacists. Some degree of automation could both accelerate the availability of allergy information and reduce the efforts for human coding.

Indexed as

Drug-Related Side Effects and Adverse ReactionsHypersensitivityBayes TheoremDelivery of Health CareHumansNatural Language ProcessingProspective Studies

Identifiers

PMID35925971
PMCPMC9352066

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.