Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35925899›Full record

ArticlePLoS biology2022

Kelp carbon sink potential decreases with warming due to accelerating decomposition.

Karen Filbee-Dexter, Colette J Feehan, Dan A Smale, Kira A Krumhansl, Skye Augustine, Florian de Bettignies, Michael T Burrows, Jarrett E K Byrnes, Jillian Campbell, Dominique Davoult and 16 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PLoS biology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Reflecting on 2022.PLoS biology · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

26 authors.

Karen Filbee-DexterInstitute of Marine Research, His, Norway.ORCID 0000-0001-8413-6797
Colette J FeehanDepartment of Biology, Montclair State University, Montclair, New Jersey, United States of America.
Dan A SmaleMarine Biological Association of the United Kingdom, The Laboratory, Plymouth, United Kingdom.
Kira A KrumhanslBedford Institute of Oceanography, Fisheries and Oceans Canada, Dartmouth, Nova Scotia, Canada.
Skye AugustineDepartment of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Florian de BettigniesSorbonne Université, CNRS, Station Biologique de Roscoff, Place Georges Teissier, Roscoff, France.
Michael T BurrowsScottish Association for Marine Science, Oban, Argyll, Scotland.
Jarrett E K ByrnesDepartment of Biology, University of Massachusetts Boston, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
Jillian CampbellDepartment of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Dominique DavoultSorbonne Université, CNRS, Station Biologique de Roscoff, Place Georges Teissier, Roscoff, France.
Kenneth H DuntonMarine Science Institute, The University of Texas at Austin, Port Aransas, Texas, United States of America.
João N FrancoMarine and Environmental Sciences Centre, ESTM, Politécnico de Leiria, Peniche, Portugal.
Ignacio GarridoDepartment of Biology and Québec-Océan, Laval University, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Sean P GraceDepartment of Biology, Werth Center for Coastal and Marine Studies, Southern Connecticut State University, New Haven, Connecticut, United States of America.
Kasper HanckeNorwegian Institute for Water Research (NIVA), Section for Marine Biology, Oslo, Norway.
Ladd E JohnsonDepartment of Biology and Québec-Océan, Laval University, Québec, Québec, Canada.
Brenda KonarCollege of Fisheries and Ocean Sciences, University of Alaska Fairbanks, Fairbanks, Alaska, United States of America.
Pippa J MooreThe Dove Marine Laboratory, School of Natural and Environmental Science, Newcastle University, Newcastle, United Kingdom.
Kjell Magnus NorderhaugInstitute of Marine Research, His, Norway.
Alasdair O'DellScottish Association for Marine Science, Oban, Argyll, Scotland.
Morten F PedersenDepartment of Science and Environment, Roskilde University, Roskilde, Denmark.
Anne K SalomonDepartment of Biology, University of Victoria, Victoria, British Columbia, Canada.
Isabel Sousa-PintoCIIMAR-Interdisciplinary Centre of Marine and Environmental Research, and Faculty of Sciences, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Scott TiegsOakland University, Department of Biological Sciences, Michigan, United States of America.
Dara YiuDepartment of Biology, Montclair State University, Montclair, New Jersey, United States of America.
Thomas WernbergInstitute of Marine Research, His, Norway.

Funding

Medical Research Council MR/S032827/1
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cycling of organic carbon in the ocean has the potential to mitigate or exacerbate global climate change, but major questions remain about the environmental controls on organic carbon flux in the coastal zone. Here, we used a field experiment distributed across 28° of latitude, and the entire range of 2 dominant kelp species in the northern hemisphere, to measure decomposition rates of kelp detritus on the seafloor in relation to local environmental factors. Detritus decomposition in both species were strongly related to ocean temperature and initial carbon content, with higher rates of biomass loss at lower latitudes with warmer temperatures. Our experiment showed slow overall decomposition and turnover of kelp detritus and modeling of coastal residence times at our study sites revealed that a significant portion of this production can remain intact long enough to reach deep marine sinks. The results suggest that decomposition of these kelp species could accelerate with ocean warming and that low-latitude kelp forests could experience the greatest increase in remineralization with a 9% to 42% reduced potential for transport to long-term ocean sinks under short-term (RCP4.5) and long-term (RCP8.5) warming scenarios. However, slow decomposition at high latitudes, where kelp abundance is predicted to expand, indicates potential for increasing kelp-carbon sinks in cooler (northern) regions. Our findings reveal an important latitudinal gradient in coastal ecosystem function that provides an improved capacity to predict the implications of ocean warming on carbon cycling. Broad-scale patterns in organic carbon decomposition revealed here can be used to identify hotspots of carbon sequestration potential and resolve relationships between carbon cycling processes and ocean climate at a global scale.

Indexed as

KelpCarbonCarbon SequestrationClimate ChangeEcosystemCarbon

Identifiers

PMID35925899
PMCPMC9352061

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.