Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35925887›Full record

ArticleProceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America2022

Improving power in functional magnetic resonance imaging by moving beyond cluster-level inference.

Stephanie Noble, Amanda F Mejia, Andrew Zalesky, Dustin Scheinost

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 38 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
38citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
6.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

38 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 60 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. The Hidden Landscape of Missed Effects in Human Functional Neuroimaging.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. A functional system-informed graph neural network framework to quantify interpretable brain dysfunction in ASD.Neural networks : the official journal of the International Neural Network Society · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Familial transmission of neural representations for mental arithmetic across two generations.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2025
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Stephanie NobleDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06519.ORCID 0000-0002-4804-5553
Amanda F MejiaDepartment of Statistics, Indiana University Bloomington, Bloomington, IN 47408.ORCID 0000-0002-4312-8974
Andrew ZaleskyMelbourne Neuropsychiatry Centre, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC 3010, Australia.
Dustin ScheinostDepartment of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT 06519.ORCID 0000-0002-6301-1167
Yale University · USIndiana University Bloomington · USThe University of Melbourne · AU

Funding

Yale Clinical and Translational Science Award (U Component)UL1TR001863 · NCATS · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI John H. Krystal, LUCILA OHNO-MACHADO · 2016 to 2026
$102.9M
Mapping the Human Connectome: Structure, Function, and HeritabilityU54MH091657 · NIMH · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI UGURBIL, KAMIL, VAN ESSEN, DAVID C · 2010 to 2014
$34.7M
Bayesian methods for cortical surface neuroimaging dataR01EB027119 · NIBIB · TRUSTEES OF INDIANA UNIVERSITY · PI MEJIA, AMANDA · 2019 to 2022
$1.8M
Constrained Network-Based Multiple Comparison CorrectionK00MH122372 · NIMH · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI NOBLE, STEPHANIE MARIE · 2019 to 2021
$242k
HHS | NIH | National Institute of Biomedical Imaging and Bioengineering (NIBIB) R01EB027119HHS | NIH | National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) K00MH122372NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR001863NIBIB NIH HHS R01 EB027119NIMH NIH HHS K00 MH122372NIMH NIH HHS U54 MH091657
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Inference in neuroimaging typically occurs at the level of focal brain areas or circuits. Yet, increasingly, well-powered studies paint a much richer picture of broad-scale effects distributed throughout the brain, suggesting that many focal reports may only reflect the tip of the iceberg of underlying effects. How focal versus broad-scale perspectives influence the inferences we make has not yet been comprehensively evaluated using real data. Here, we compare sensitivity and specificity across procedures representing multiple levels of inference using an empirical benchmarking procedure that resamples task-based connectomes from the Human Connectome Project dataset (∼1,000 subjects, 7 tasks, 3 resampling group sizes, 7 inferential procedures). Only broad-scale (network and whole brain) procedures obtained the traditional 80% statistical power level to detect an average effect, reflecting >20% more statistical power than focal (edge and cluster) procedures. Power also increased substantially for false discovery rate- compared with familywise error rate-controlling procedures. The downsides are fairly limited; the loss in specificity for broad-scale and FDR procedures was relatively modest compared to the gains in power. Furthermore, the broad-scale methods we introduce are simple, fast, and easy to use, providing a straightforward starting point for researchers. This also points to the promise of more sophisticated broad-scale methods for not only functional connectivity but also related fields, including task-based activation. Altogether, this work demonstrates that shifting the scale of inference and choosing FDR control are both immediately attainable and can help remedy the issues with statistical power plaguing typical studies in the field.

Indexed as

ConnectomeMagnetic Resonance ImagingBrainHumansempiricalfMRIinferencenetworkpower

Identifiers

PMID35925887
PMCPMC9371642
OpenAlexW4289847319

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.