Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35925546›Full record

SynthesisEating and weight disorders : EWD2022

The prevalence and risk factors of screen-based disordered eating among university students: a global systematic review, meta-analysis, and meta-regression.

Omar A Alhaj, Feten Fekih-Romdhane, Dima H Sweidan, Zahra Saif, Mina F Khudhair, Hadeel Ghazzawi, Mohammed Sh Nadar, Saad S Alhajeri, Michael P Levine, Haitham Jahrami

Abstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Eating and weight disorders : EWD, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Time to Address Eating Disorder Risk Among Medical Students.Behavioral sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Prevalence and associated factors of disordered eating among university and college students: A systematic review of Malaysian studies.Malaysian family physician : the official journal of the Academy of Family Physicians of Malaysia · 2026
    Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Omar A AlhajDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Petra, Amman, Jordan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0082-3843
Feten Fekih-RomdhaneFaculty of Medicine of Tunis, Tunis El Manar University, Tunis, Tunisia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2569-8017
Dima H SweidanDepartment of Nutrition, Faculty of Pharmacy and Medical Sciences, University of Petra, Amman, Jordan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5224-7222
Zahra SaifMinistry of Health, Manama, Bahrain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2749-3274
Mina F KhudhairDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine and Medical Sciences, Arabian Gulf University, Manama, Bahrain.
Hadeel GhazzawiNutrition and Food Science Department, Agriculture School, The University of Jordan, P.O.Box 11942, Amman, Jordan.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3045-4153
Mohammed Sh NadarOccasional Therapy Department, Faculty of Allied Health Sciences, Kuwait University, Kuwait City, Kuwait.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4281-5630
Saad S AlhajeriMinistry of Health, Kuwait City, Kuwait.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3223-2135
Michael P LevineEmeritus Professor, Department of Psychology, Kenyon College, Gambier, OH, 43022, USA.
Haitham JahramiMinistry of Health, Manama, Bahrain. hjahrami@health.gov.bh.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8990-1320

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeThe purpose of this review was to estimate the prevalence of screen-based disordered eating (SBDE) and several potential risk factors in university undergraduate students around the world.

methodsAn electronic search of nine data bases was conducted from the inception of the databases until 1st October 2021. Disordered eating was defined as the percentage of students scoring at or above established cut-offs on validated screening measures. Global data were also analyzed by country, research measure, and culture. Other confounders in this review were age, BMI, and sex.

resultsUsing random-effects meta-analysis, the mean estimate of the distribution of effects for the prevalence of SBDE among university students (K = 105, N = 145,629) was [95% CI] = 19.7% [17.9%; 21.6%], I

conclusionsThese findings support previous studies indicating that many undergraduate students are struggling with disordered eating or a diagnosable eating disorder, but are neither receiver effective prevention nor accessing accurate diagnosis and available treatment. It is particularly important to develop ever more valid ways of identifying students with high levels of disordered eating and offering them original or culturally appropriate and effective prevention or early treatment. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: I, systematic review and meta-analysis.

Indexed as

Feeding and Eating DisordersBayes TheoremFemaleHumansPrevalenceRisk FactorsStudentsUniversitiesAdolescencesBody imageBody mass indexEating disordersFeeding and eating disorders

Identifiers

PMID35925546
PMCPMC9362208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.