ReviewOrthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)2022
[Treatment options for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome and osteoarthritis].
Review in Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) is a prearthritic deformity. Many patients with FAIS show signs of osteoarthritis at the time of initial presentation. Ideally, surgical correction of FAIS should stop the progression of osteoarthritis. However, biological changes in the joint, inflammatory processes, and patient-specific factors, which are not influenced by surgery, show a role in the progression of joint degeneration. Thus, it is not surprising that the results of joint-preserving surgery in FAIS and osteoarthritis Tönnis grade 2 and higher are bad, and patients often need to undergo total hip replacement (THR).Even in patients with initial osteoarthritis (Tönnis grade 1) the results of joint-preserving surgery are significantly worse in comparison to in patients without osteoarthritis. As this pathology occurs mainly in young patients, efforts should be made to avoid THR, as the risk of loosening and revision surgery is increased. Analysis of risk factors that lead to worse outcome in joint-preserving surgery can be helpful. Age > 45 years, adiposity, high alpha angle, CE angle < 25° and female sex are risk factors that lead to worse outcome in patients with risk factors and osteoarthritis Tönnis grade 1, the success rate of joint-preserving surgery after 5 years is below 50%. Therefore, we recommend non-surgical treatment. Promising is the use of mesenchymal progenitor cells (MPCs), even if their routine use has not been established. If conservative therapy is not successful, THR is indicated. With the use of modern bearings, a survival rate of THR of more than 90% after 15 years is reported in patients < 50 years. Patient satisfaction after THR is higher than after joint-preserving surgery.The combination of treatment modalities like joint-preserving surgery in combination with the application of MPCs to both correct the mechanical conflict and also influence progression of osteoarthritis is promising the from a biological point of view.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.