Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35925371›Full record

ReviewOrthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany)2022

[Results after FAIS surgery-what is the evidence?]

Stefan Fickert, Stefan Landgraeber

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Orthopadie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 89% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Stefan FickertSporthopaedicum Straubing - Berlin - Regensburg - München, Bahnhofplatz 27, 94315, Straubing, Deutschland. fickert@sporthopaedicum.de.
Stefan LandgraeberKlinik für Orthopädie und Orthopädische Chirurgie, Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes, Homburg, Deutschland.
Universitätsklinikum des Saarlandes · DEUniversity Hospital Heidelberg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe treatment of femoroacetabular impingement syndrome (FAIS) and its sequelae has changed over the past 20 years based on a steadily increasing understanding of the condition and improvements in surgical techniques. QUESTION: What is the evidence for the treatment of FAIS?

methodsAnalysis of the available literature, structured review, and discussion of the relevant literature.

resultsThe treatment of FAIS has evolved over time through several phases. In the first phase, the clinical picture and its open treatment by surgical hip dislocation were described. Subsequently, the first comparative studies between open, mini-open, and arthroscopic therapy were published. After development of disease-specific patient-reported outcome measurement systems, the concerns of the young, more active patient population could be captured. In recent years, prospective randomized controlled trials comparing conservative versus surgical therapy of FAIS have been published, showing the superiority of surgical treatment and also the need to strengthen evidence-based research especially in the field of conservative treatment of FAIS.

conclusionThe pathomechanism and sequelae of FAIS have been increasingly studied scientifically in recent years. The superiority of a particular surgical technique cannot be demonstrated; the arthroscopic technique has a lower complication rate and a faster convalescence. Clinically important outcome measures are also becoming increasingly established in the therapy of FAIS to capture the clinical relevance for the individual.

Indexed as

Femoracetabular ImpingementActivities of Daily LivingArthroscopyHumansProspective StudiesTreatment OutcomeArthroscopyEvidence-based medicineHipOutcomeSurgical hip dislocation

Identifiers

PMID35925371
OpenAlexW4281298287

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.