Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35925367›Full record

ArticleDie Ophthalmologie2022

[Scientific performance of ophthalmological research institutions in Germany 2018-2020 : Studies, publications, third-party funding and more-The research map of the German Ophthalmological Society (DOG)].

Friederike Schaub, Birgit Mele, Philip Gass, Marius Ader, Horst Helbig, Wolf A Lagrèze, Ursula Schlötzer-Schrehardt, Marius Ueffing, Claus Cursiefen, das DOG Forschungslandkartenteam

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Die Ophthalmologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Friederike SchaubZentrum für Augenheilkunde, Medizinische Fakultät und Uniklinik Köln, Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50924, Köln, Deutschland. friederike.schaub@uk-koeln.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2648-1626
Birgit MeleDeutsche Ophthalmologische Gesellschaft e. V. (DOG), München, Deutschland.
Philip GassDeutsche Ophthalmologische Gesellschaft e. V. (DOG), München, Deutschland.
Marius AderArbeitskreis Forschung der DOG (AK DOG-Forschung).
Horst HelbigArbeitskreis Forschung der DOG (AK DOG-Forschung).
Wolf A LagrèzeArbeitskreis Forschung der DOG (AK DOG-Forschung).
Ursula Schlötzer-SchrehardtArbeitskreis Forschung der DOG (AK DOG-Forschung).
Marius UeffingArbeitskreis Forschung der DOG (AK DOG-Forschung).
Claus CursiefenZentrum für Augenheilkunde, Medizinische Fakultät und Uniklinik Köln, Universität zu Köln, Kerpener Str. 62, 50924, Köln, Deutschland.
das DOG Forschungslandkartenteam

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe German Ophthalmological Society (DOG) regularly records the scientific activities of ophthalmological research institutions in Germany.

objectiveWith this publication the DOG wants to make the performance of scientific ophthalmology in Germany transparent and increase the options for future research cooperation with facilities of research institutions.

methodsSystematic survey of German research centers in ophthalmology.

resultsThe current research map records the data from 41 German research centers for the reporting period 2018-2020. Compared to previous editions of the research map, there has been a significant increase in scientific activity. The number of studies reported rose to 496. The number of government funded research projects (n = 121) and projects funded by foundations (n = 108) also increased. Furthermore, the number of scientific publications has almost doubled: while 1919 were published in the period from 2012 to 2014 and 2305 in the period from 2015 to 2017, there were 4215 in the current reporting period. The map also reports on a continuous increase in the number of young scientists in ophthalmology.

conclusionThe research map demonstrates the performance of German scientific ophthalmology. At the same time, the need for research in ophthalmology remains high because many diseases that affect the eyes are not yet or not yet completely curable.

Indexed as

OphthalmologyPhysiciansForecastingGermanyHumansSocieties, MedicalEfficiency of ophthalmologyGermanyPublicationsResearchResearch cooperationScientific activity

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.