Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35925346›Full record

ReviewDie Ophthalmologie2022

[Macular folds after surgical repair of retinal detachment].

Christos Haritoglou, Anselm Kampik, Armin Wolf

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Die Ophthalmologie, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Christos HaritoglouAugenklinik Herzog Carl Theodor, Nymphenburger Str. 43, 80335, München, Deutschland. christos.haritoglou@med.uni-muenchen.de.
Anselm KampikPrivate Augenarztpraxis München, Prof. Kampik & Kollegen, Augenzentrum Brienner Hof, Brienner Str. 12, 80333, München, Deutschland.
Armin WolfAugenklinik, Universität Ulm, Prittwitzstr. 43, 89075, Ulm, Deutschland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The incidence of retinal folds following surgical repair of retinal detachment is underestimated. The extent of retinal folds is variable and can include the complete retina with all layers and an apposition of the photoreceptor outer segments or only partially affect the outer or inner retinal layers. While complete folds can be relatively easily detected by clinical examination, discrete partial folds are sometimes difficult to assess biomicroscopically. In these cases, high-resolution optical coherence tomography (OCT) plays an important role as a tool for differential diagnosis. If macular translocation occurs during the formation of folds, mostly in associated with inferior retinal folds, patients often complain of binocular double vision. A significant reduction of visual acuity and metamorphopsia occur in cases where the folding involves the fovea. In general, retinal folds tend to resolve spontaneously over a prolonged period of follow-up of several months; however, in cases of foveal involvement and corresponding symptoms, a surgical revision can be indicated, although the surgical procedure is not standardized.

Indexed as

Retinal DetachmentRetinal DiseasesHumansTomography, Optical CoherenceVisual AcuityVitrectomyDouble visionGas tamponadeOptical coherence tomographyRetinal foldVisual impairment

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.