Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35925322›Full record

ArticleIntensive care medicine2022

Continuous intra-abdominal pressure: is it ready for prime time?

Manu L N G Malbrain, Bart L De Keulenaer, Ashish K Khanna

Registry-linked trialAbstract readEditorial
In one paragraph

Article in Intensive care medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07085286 (Prognostic Value of Continuous Intra-abdominal Pressure), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07085286 not yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2026, after this paper: background citation

Prognostic Value of Continuous Intra-abdominal Pressure (CIAP) and Continuous Abdominal Perfusion Pressure (CAPP) Monitoring for Acute Kidney Injury (AKI) Prediuction in Patients Undergoing Coronary Artery Bypass Graft (CABG) Surgery

Typeobservational_patient_registrySponsorMedical University of LublinRan2026 to 2026Enrolled45ConditionsAKI - Acute Kidney Injury, CABGArmsContinous IAP measurement
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Management of giant inguinal hernia; report of four cases and review of literature.Hernia : the journal of hernias and abdominal wall surgery · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Manu L N G MalbrainFirst Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, Medical University of Lublin, Lublin, Poland. manu.malbrain@telenet.be.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1816-5255
Bart L De KeulenaerIntensive Care, Fiona Stanley Hospital, Murdoch, WA, Australia.
Ashish K KhannaWake Forest University School of Medicine, Atrium Health Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center, Winston-Salem, NC, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as

Intra-Abdominal HypertensionAbdomenHumansPressure

Identifiers

PMID35925322
PMCPMC9468118

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.