ArticleDermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2022
[Anti-IgE-directed treatment of urticaria in a dermatological practice].
Article in Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
We conducted a retrospective data analysis of 26 patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU), 12 of whom had been treated with anti-IgE therapy (omalizumab). The subcohort of patients treated with omalizumab displayed more severe and prolonged courses of disease. In addition, they had often undergone various inpatient therapies, frequently presenting with concomitant angioedema. Collecting the Urticaria Activity Scores from the seven daily values for wheals and itching (UAS7) proved an important and suitable instrument for the determination and assessment of the course of therapy in the dermatological office. Elaborate laboratory screenings, however, seem far less indicative of the severity, prognosis and course of the disease. Omalizumab proved to be a viable and well-tolerated treatment option. One third of the patients were completely free of all symptoms, another third showed very good improvement, whereas the last third showed no improvement at all, even when omalizumab and/or concomitant therapies were escalated.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.