Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35925210›Full record

ReviewDermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2022

[Local therapeutic procedure for blisters of the skin: a position paper of the Initiative Chronic Wounds (ICW)].

Joachim Dissemond, Anke Bültemann, Veronika Gerber, Martin Motzkus, Christian Münter, Cornelia Erfurt-Berge

Open access · hybridAbstract readReviewConsensus Statement
In one paragraph

Review in Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 44% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Joachim DissemondKlinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie, Venerologie und Allergologie, Universitätsklinikum Essen, Hufelandstraße 55, 45122, Essen, Deutschland. joachim.dissemond@uk-essen.de.
Anke Bültemann
Veronika Gerber
Martin Motzkus
Christian Münter
Cornelia Erfurt-Berge
Essen University Hospital · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Blisters of the skin can be caused by very different diseases. Therefore, it is an interdisciplinary and interprofessionally relevant challenge. In the clinical routine different local therapeutic procedures are currently practiced. Either the blister is left in place or the blister is punctured and the blister roof is left in place; alternatively, the complete blister roof is ablated. Each of these approaches has potential advantages and disadvantages. A review of the current literature and consensus by the experts of the Initiative Chronische Wunde (ICW) e.V. was performed. The following approaches are recommended: uncomplicated blisters without pressure pain: leave blisters in place; pressure painful and palmar and plantar localized blisters: puncture blister and leave roof; ruptured blisters without clinical signs of infection: leave remnants of bladder roof; ruptured bladders with clinical signs of infection: remove remnants of the blister roof; blisters in burns of grade 2a or higher or in cases of unclear burn depth or chemical burn: remove blister roof. This is followed in each case by the application of a sterile wound dressing. There is no single correct local therapeutic procedure for blisters on the skin. When planning a therapeutic concept, the genesis of the blisters should be clarified and, if necessary, causal treatment should be given. Local therapy is then based on various individual factors. Thus, the approach chosen together with the patient can vary between individuals.

Indexed as

BurnsSkin DiseasesSoft Tissue InjuriesBandagesBlisterHumansPainSkinBurnsDermatologyErosionsInfectionsPain

Identifiers

PMID35925210
PMCPMC9512739
OpenAlexW4283807985

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.