Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35925206›Full record

ReviewDermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2022

[Pruritus in atopic dermatitis-comparative evaluation of novel treatment approaches].

Svenja Müller, Felix Witte, Sonja Ständer

Open access · bronzeAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Dermatologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
1.5field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Svenja MüllerKlinik und Poliklinik für Dermatologie und Allergologie, Universitätsklinikum Bonn, Bonn, Deutschland. svenja2.mueller@ukbonn.de.
Felix WitteKlinik für Hautkrankheiten, Kompetenzzentrum Chronischer Pruritus (KCP), Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Deutschland.
Sonja StänderKlinik für Hautkrankheiten, Kompetenzzentrum Chronischer Pruritus (KCP), Universitätsklinikum Münster, Münster, Deutschland.
Klinik und Poliklinik für Hautkrankheiten · DEUniversity Hospital Bonn · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chronic pruritus (duration ≥ 6 weeks) affects about 91% of patients suffering from atopic dermatitis (AD). Pruritus is often accompanied by sensations such as pain, burning, stinging, and heat, resulting in a high burden of affected patients; sleep and quality of life may be severely impaired. An important pillar of AD treatment is also to achieve sufficient control of pruritus. In addition to intensively used emollients, corticosteroids and calcineurin inhibitors have proven effective. In case of eczema affecting a large part of the body surface area (BSA), phototherapy may contribute to the healing of eczema and the relief of atopic pruritus. As to systemic therapies, several approved biologics (dupilumab, tralokinumab) and small molecules (baricitinib, upadacitinib, abrocitinib) lead to a rapid improvement of pruritus by interfering with the signal transduction of proinflammatory cytokines. While Janus kinase inhibitors initially lead to a faster relief of pruritus than biologics, the antipruritic efficacy of biologics and Janus kinase inhibitors seems to be similar in long-term use.

Indexed as

Biological ProductsDermatitis, AtopicEczemaJanus Kinase InhibitorsHumansPruritusQuality of LifeBiological ProductsJanus Kinase InhibitorsAtopic itchBiologicsJanus-kinase inhibitorsTherapy recommendation

Identifiers

PMID35925206
PMCPMC9186486
OpenAlexW4283807604

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.