ReviewUnfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany)2022
[Cement augmentation in pelvic ring fractures].
Review in Unfallchirurgie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fragility Fractures of the Pelvis-Current Understanding and Open Questions.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Article
- Bone cement reinforcement improves the therapeutic effects of screws in elderly patients with pelvic fragility factures.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2024Article
- Stabilization of Traumatic Iliosacral Instability Using Innovative Implants: A Biomechanical Comparison.Journal of clinical medicine · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cement augmentation of sacroiliac (SI) screws in the posterior pelvic ring has been shown to provide greater biomechanical stability in cadaveric studies. Pelvic ring fractures are relatively rare compared to the total number of fractures. Nevertheless, the 1‑year mortality rate of up to 27% is very high, especially for geriatric pelvic ring fractures and is also largely associated with reduced mobility due to the fracture. The primary goal of treatment is therefore the restoration of patient mobility. This requires the achievement of sufficient stability of the pelvic ring. As osteoporosis is often a causative factor for the pelvic ring fracture, a more stable anchoring of the implants in the osteoporotic bone can be achieved by cement augmentation. This article presents the possibilities of cement augmentation of the pelvic ring and describes the technique of cement-augmented SI screws.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.