Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35925131›Full record

ArticleInnere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany)2022

[Coagulation diagnostics in the clinical routine-Part 1 : Evaluation of the risk of bleeding before surgery, interventions and diagnostics in bleeding diathesis].

Michael Metze, Martin Platz, Christian Pfrepper, Sirak Petros

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.2field-weighted citation impact, top 46% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Michael MetzeKlinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland. michael.metze@medizin.uni-leipzig.de.
Martin PlatzKlinik und Poliklinik für Kardiologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Liebigstr. 20, 04103, Leipzig, Deutschland.
Christian PfrepperKlinik und Poliklinik für Hämatologie, Zelltherapie und Hämostaseologie, Bereich Hämostaseologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland.
Sirak PetrosKlinik und Poliklinik für Hämatologie, Zelltherapie und Hämostaseologie, Bereich Hämostaseologie, Universitätsklinikum Leipzig, Leipzig, Deutschland.
University Hospital Leipzig · DEKlinik und Poliklinik für Neurologie · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article on coagulation diagnostics is published in two parts covering five common clinical scenarios for coagulation diagnostics. Part 1 deals with the diagnostics prior to invasive interventions and coagulation diagnostics to clarify a tendency to bleeding. The global parameters Quick and activated partial thromboplastin time are established for monitoring certain anticoagulants; however, they are not predictive with respect to the risk of bleeding prior to elective invasive interventions. In this context, disorders of primary hemostasis are frequent, which are insufficiently detected by the global parameters. Most clinical bleeding tendencies are due to acquired causes. These include anticoagulants and diseases which can be accompanied by tendency to bleeding. For coagulation tests preanalytical issues are essential in order to avoid false results. The interpretation should always be made in the context of the current physiological state.

Indexed as

Blood Coagulation DisordersAnticoagulantsBlood CoagulationBlood Coagulation TestsDisease SusceptibilityHemorrhageHumansAnticoagulantsAnticoagulantsBleeding riskHemorrhageThrombocytopenia, heparin-inducedThrombophilia

Identifiers

PMID35925131
OpenAlexW4290101235

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.