Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35925111›Full record

ArticleUrologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2022

[Acceptance and status of digitalization in clinics and practices : Current assessment in German urology].

Angelika Borkowetz, Marianne Leitsmann, Martin Baunacke, Hendrik Borgmann, Katharina Boehm, Christer Groeben, Jan Roigas, Andreas W Schneider, Thomas Speck, Immo Schroeder-Printzen and 6 more

Abstract readEnglish Abstract
In one paragraph

Article in Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. [Digitalization in urology-challenge and opportunity].Urologie (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2023
    Review
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Angelika BorkowetzKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland. angelika.borkowetz@uniklinikum-dresden.de.
Marianne LeitsmannKlinik für Urologie, Medizinische Universität Graz, Graz, Österreich.
Martin BaunackeKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.
Hendrik BorgmannKlinik für Urologie, Universitätsmedizin Mainz, Mainz, Deutschland.
Katharina BoehmKlinik und Poliklinik für Urologie, Universitätsklinikum Dresden, Technische Universität Dresden, Fetscherstraße 74, 01307, Dresden, Deutschland.
Christer GroebenKlinik für Urologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Deutschland.
Jan RoigasKlinik für Urologie, Vivantes Klinikum Friedrichshain, Berlin, Deutschland.
Andreas W SchneiderKooperative Belegarztpraxis für Urologie, Winsen/Luhe, Deutschland.
Thomas SpeckPraxis Urologie, Berlin, Deutschland.
Immo Schroeder-PrintzenUniversitätsklinikum Gießen, Gießen, Deutschland.
Susanne ZillichUrologische und Kinderurologische Klinik, Universitätsklinikum Erlangen, Erlangen, Deutschland.
Björn VolkmerKlinik für Urologie, Klinikum Kassel, Kassel, Deutschland.
Ulrich WitzschKlinik für Urologie und Kinderurologie, Krankenhaus Nordwest, Frankfurt am Main, Deutschland.
Johannes HuberKlinik für Urologie, Philipps-Universität Marburg, Marburg, Deutschland.
Arbeitskreis Versorgungsforschung, Qualität und Ökonomie der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Urologie e. V.
Arbeitskreis Informationstechnologie und Dokumentation der Deutschen Gesellschaft für Urologie e. V.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundDigitalization of patient documentation and introduction of the electronic patient record (ePA) pose challenges to everyday clinical practice.

objectivesWe investigated the acceptance and status of the digitalization of patient data and the introduction of the ePA among German urologists. MATERIALS AND

methodsA questionnaire with 30 questions about the acceptance and status of digitalization of patient documentation and ePA was sent out via the newsletter of the German Society of Urology.

resultsA total of 80 urologists participated in the survey (response rate 2%). Digital platforms such as Urotube or Researchgate are used by 63% of participants. The complete implementation of digital patient documentation was reported by 72% of respondents working in medical practice and by 54% of those working in the hospital (p = 0.042). While 76% see the digitalization process as reasonable, 34% expressed partial or strong concerns about the complete digitalization of patient documentation. Only 14% of the participants offer video consultations. Advantages for ePA include better networking of the healthcare system (73%), improved diagnosis, indication (41%) and treatment quality (48%), and avoidance of medication errors (70%).

conclusionGerman urologists are open to the digitalization process and ePA. Especially younger urologists are using digital media. The advantages of digitalization are, in particular, an improvement in treatment processes. For a smooth introduction, a cross-departmental establishment and, if necessary, an adaptation of the treatment processes are necessary.

Indexed as

InternetHumansDigitalizationDigital mediaElectronic patient recordVideo consultationVirtual tumor board

Identifiers

PMID35925111
PMCPMC9729156

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.