Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35925061›Full record

ReviewRadiologie (Heidelberg, Germany)2022

[The world of light in diagnostic medicine : Current developments in optical imaging].

Ingrid Hilger

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Radiologie (Heidelberg, Germany), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Ingrid HilgerAbt. Experimentelle Radiologie, Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Universitätsklinikum Jena, Friedrich Schiller Universität Jena, Am Klinikum 1, 07740, Jena, Deutschland. ingrid.hilger@med.uni-jena.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Optical imaging has always played a central role in the elucidation of biological and physiological mechanisms in modern biology and medicine. Based on the good experiences in light microscopy, sophisticated meso- and macroscopic optical imaging systems have recently been created. All optical imaging methods are characterized by high user-friendliness and sensitivity, they are associated with relatively low costs and do not require any radioactivity. Its clinical performance is seen in the intraoperative imaging of the tissue area to be removed and in the radiotracer-free diagnosis of diseases in body areas with good accessibility to light. From a pathomorphological point of view, the focus was particularly on the depiction of tumors and inflammation. Imaging detection of fluorescent dyes with emission characteristics in the near-infrared range of the spectrum is favorable in terms of a good signal-to-background ratio and improved information acquisition from greater tissue depths. A major challenge, however, is the diverse photon interactions with the tissue. Previous research and development work has produced various in vivo optical imaging methods, some of which are still in the experimental stage (e.g., fluorescence-mediated tomography, multispectral in vivo imaging, bioluminescence imaging, Raman spectroscopy), while others already have made their way into the clinical setting (e.g., fluorescence reflection imaging, optoacoustic imaging). The most important optical methods are presented in this review article.

Indexed as

RadiopharmaceuticalsTomographyFluorescent DyesMicroscopyOptical ImagingFluorescent DyesRadiopharmaceuticalsFluorescenceOptical imagingOptoacousticsRamanTomography

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.