ArticleBioinformatics (Oxford, England)2022
3D GAN image synthesis and dataset quality assessment for bacterial biofilm.
Article in Bioinformatics (Oxford, England), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
9 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Deep learning-based high-information-content graph representation of early stage bacterial biofilms.NPJ biofilms and microbiomes · 2026Article
- BacQuant: A Scalable Automated Image Processing Pipeline for Quantifying Biofilm Aggregates.microPublication biology · 2026Article
- Biofilms Exposed: Innovative Imaging and Therapeutic Platforms for Persistent Infections.Antibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- MotGen: a closed-loop bacterial motility control framework using generative adversarial networks.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2024Article
- DeepSeeded: Volumetric Segmentation of Dense Cell Populations with a Cascade of Deep Neural Networks in Bacterial Biofilm Applications.Expert systems with applications · 2024Article
- Semi-supervised auto-segmentation method for pelvic organ-at-risk in magnetic resonance images based on deep-learning.Journal of applied clinical medical physics · 2024Article
- NISNet3D: three-dimensional nuclear synthesis and instance segmentation for fluorescence microscopy images.Scientific reports · 2023Article
- Detection of abnormal extraocular muscles in small datasets of computed tomography images using a three-dimensional variational autoencoder.Scientific reports · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
motivationData-driven deep learning techniques usually require a large quantity of labeled training data to achieve reliable solutions in bioimage analysis. However, noisy image conditions and high cell density in bacterial biofilm images make 3D cell annotations difficult to obtain. Alternatively, data augmentation via synthetic data generation is attempted, but current methods fail to produce realistic images.
resultsThis article presents a bioimage synthesis and assessment workflow with application to augment bacterial biofilm images. 3D cyclic generative adversarial networks (GAN) with unbalanced cycle consistency loss functions are exploited in order to synthesize 3D biofilm images from binary cell labels. Then, a stochastic synthetic dataset quality assessment (SSQA) measure that compares statistical appearance similarity between random patches from random images in two datasets is proposed. Both SSQA scores and other existing image quality measures indicate that the proposed 3D Cyclic GAN, along with the unbalanced loss function, provides a reliably realistic (as measured by mean opinion score) 3D synthetic biofilm image. In 3D cell segmentation experiments, a GAN-augmented training model also presents more realistic signal-to-background intensity ratio and improved cell counting accuracy. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: https://github.com/jwang-c/DeepBiofilm. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.