Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35924968›Full record

ArticleNeurorehabilitation and neural repair2022

Relationships Among Environmental Variables, Physical Capacity, Balance Self-Efficacy, and Real-World Walking Activity Post-Stroke.

Allison Miller, Ryan T Pohlig, Darcy S Reisman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Human-AI Cooperation in Healthcare and Rehabilitation.Delaware journal of public health · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. A Systematic Scoping Review of Poststroke Engagement in Physical Activity.Archives of rehabilitation research and clinical translation · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Allison MillerDepartment of Biomechanics and Movement Science Program, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3043-6852
Ryan T PohligDepartment of Biostatistics Core Facility, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.
Darcy S ReismanDepartment of Biomechanics and Movement Science Program, University of Delaware, Newark, DE, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-6546-0863

Funding

Promoting Recovery Optimization with WALKing Exercise after Stroke (PROWALKS)R01HD086362 · NICHD · UNIVERSITY OF DELAWARE · PI REISMAN, DARCY S. · 2016 to 2020
$4.0M
NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD086362
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial and physical environmental factors affect real-world walking activity in individuals with stroke. However, environmental factors are often non-modifiable, presenting a challenge for clinicians working with individuals with stroke whose real-world walking is limited due to environmental barriers.

objectiveThe purpose of this work was to test a model hypothesizing the relationships among environmental factors (specifically, living situation and area deprivation), modifiable factors, and real-world walking activity to understand opportunities for intervention. We hypothesized that balance self-efficacy would mediate the relationship between the environment and real-world walking and that physical capacity would moderate this mediation.

methodsThis was a cross-sectional study of 282 individuals with chronic (≥6 months) stroke. We tested the indirect effect to determine if mediation was present. Multiple group structural equation modeling was used to test if physical capacity moderated this mediation. A

resultsBalance self-efficacy mediated the relationship between area deprivation and real-world walking (indirect effect:

conclusionsTargeting balance self-efficacy may be an effective approach to improving real-world walking in persons with stroke who experience barriers within the physical environment. A stroke survivor's physical capacity may not impact this approach. Future work should consider utilizing more specific measures of the social and physical environment to better understand their influences on real-world walking activity in individuals with stroke. However, the results of this work provide excellent targets for future longitudinal studies targeting real-world walking activity in stroke.

Indexed as

StrokeStroke RehabilitationCross-Sectional StudiesHumansPostural BalanceSelf EfficacyWalkingphysical activityrehabilitationtheoretical model

Identifiers

PMID35924968
PMCPMC9377718

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.