ArticleHealthcare management forum2022
Ageing, technology, and health: Advancing the concepts of autonomy and independence.
Article in Healthcare management forum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Guiding the Ethics of Locator Devices in Dementia Care: Tutorial on Developing a Question-Based Ethical Framework.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Ethics at the Intersection of Intelligent Assistive Technology, Ageing, and the Home Environment: A Scoping Review.Journal of bioethical inquiry · 2026Article
- Design considerations for miniaturized biosensor-enabled systems for older adults: insights from participatory design.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Review
- Striving for purposeful autonomy: a qualitative method to enhance autonomy measurement in older adults.BMC geriatrics · 2025Article
- "Though helpful, still hesitant": a TAM-based qualitative study on older adults' ambivalent acceptance and model extensions in AI fitness coaches.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- Uncovering the Differences: How DLQI and WHO-5 Scores Vary in Moderate-to-Severe Psoriasis Patients Treated with Tildrakizumab 100 mg vs. 200 mg?Journal of clinical medicine · 2024Article
- Understanding the Value of a Proactive Telecare System in Supporting Older Adults' Independence at Home: Qualitative Interview Study Among Key Interest Groups.Journal of medical Internet research · 2023Article
- Older Adults' Perceptions About Using Intelligent Toilet Seats Beyond Traditional Care: Web-Based Interview Survey.JMIR mHealth and uHealth · 2023Article
- The contribution of being physically active to successful aging.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2023Article
- Editorial: How can wearable robotic and sensor technology advance neurorehabilitation?Frontiers in neurorobotics · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The global pandemic expedited the adoption of AgeTech solutions that aim to help older adults maintain their autonomy and independence. This article examines the negative impact of the Western worldview of autonomy and independence on older adults. Negative impact can manifest as ageism and may be compounded by intersections of identities with race, gender, and culture. We propose an inclusive framework for health leaders, one that is not binary or categorical, but instead, on a continuum: (1) relational autonomy which assumes that relationships form one's identity; therefore, no one is autonomous to the exclusion of others, and (2) interdependence which proposes that one's lifestyle choice is supported by interreliance with aspects of one's environment. We examine two examples of AgeTech from the perspective of relational autonomy and interdependence and discuss how health leaders can use this inclusive framework to ensure that their services do not discriminate against older adults.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.