Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35924721›Full record

ArticlePrimary health care research & development2022

A longitudinal qualitative study of the UK general practice workforce experience of COVID-19.

Emily Burn, Rebecca Fisher, Louise Locock, Judith Smith

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Primary health care research & development, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Discussions about physical activity in general practice: analysis of video-recorded consultations.The British journal of general practice : the journal of the Royal College of General Practitioners · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Emily BurnResearch Fellow at University of Birmingham, Health Services Management Centre (HSMC), Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8713-5423
Rebecca FisherSenior Policy Fellow, The Health Foundation, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1092-6144
Louise LocockProfessor in Health Services Research, Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen, Aberdeen, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-8109-1930
Judith SmithProfessor of Health Policy and Management, Director of the Health Services Management Centre (HSMC), University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4036-4063

Funding

Chief Scientist Office HSRU2
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COronaVIrus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has led to significant re-organisation of general practice in the United Kingdom and around the world. The general practice workforce has led changes to their services, often dealing with high levels of uncertainty. The way in which many practitioners consult has shifted significantly, and there has been an increase in the number of phone and online consultations. We know very little about how those working in general practice experienced the service reorganisation introduced in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic.

aimThe aim of this project was to describe the changes in the delivery of general practice in the United Kingdom in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic. Furthermore, to explore primary care practitioners' and managers' experiences of change within general practice during this time and investigate shifts in perceptions of professional identities.

methodWe conducted a longitudinal qualitative study that captured narrative accounts from 17 primary care practitioners and managers across England and Scotland. Each participant submitted narrative accounts in the first year of the COVID-19 pandemic using self-recorded or written contributions, or via an interview if preferred. These were analysed using a grounded theory approach, with thematic coding used to construct common themes.

findingsParticipants' narratives describe the challenges COVID-19 presented to general practice. Responses mirror the shifts in the pandemic and its management - from an initial sense of autonomy but uncertainty, to a period of stability and patients' increasing frustration. The re-organisation of general practice has affected practitioners' views of their work and their role as clinicians. Participants' narratives were framed profoundly by the importance of their relationships with patients. This analysis of practitioners' and managers' narratives highlights the need for further exploration of how to support the general practice workforce's well-being longer term in a context of increased demand and significant change.

Indexed as

COVID-19General PracticeHumansPandemicsQualitative ResearchUnited KingdomWorkforceCOVID-19patientsprimary health carequalitative researchremote consultation

Identifiers

PMID35924721
PMCPMC9381165

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.