Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35924718›Full record

ArticlePrimary health care research & development2022

A scoping review of best practices in home enteral tube feeding.

Cliona Byrnes, David Mockler, Linda Lyons, Dorothy Loane, Edel Russell, Annemarie E Bennett

Abstract readScoping Review
In one paragraph

Article in Primary health care research & development, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. The application of home enteral nutrition in cancer patients: a scoping review.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  4. Gold Standard Home Nasogastric Tube Feeding for Infants and Children.Journal of paediatrics and child health · 2025
    Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Cliona ByrnesHuman Nutrition and Dietetics Student, Trinity College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-6575-0687
David MocklerTrinity Centre for Health Sciences, St James' Healthcare Campus, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0001-6171-8751
Linda LyonsSenior Community Dietitian, Health Service Executive, Navan, County Meath, Ireland.
Dorothy LoaneSenior Community Dietitian, Health Service Executive, Navan, County Meath, Ireland.
Edel RussellDietitian Manager, Health Service Executive, Dundalk, County Louth, Ireland.
Annemarie E BennettTrinity Centre for Health Sciences, St James' Healthcare Campus, Dublin, Ireland.ORCID 0000-0002-9674-3911

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsTo review the experiences of healthcare professionals (HCPs) and service users on the provision and receipt of home enteral nutrition (HEN) in primary care settings, respectively. BACKGROUNDS: HEN supports the nutritional needs of service users in primary care settings who are unable to meet their nutritional requirements through oral intake alone. While HEN supports service users to remain in their home, the provision of HEN services can be variable. The prevalence of HEN is increasing as health systems shift delivery of care from acute to primary care settings, and therefore the evolving needs of HCPs and service users in relation to HEN deserve exploration.

methodsQuantitative and qualitative studies were included if they described (1) practices that support best outcomes in adults on HEN and residing in their own homes and/or (2) service user and HCP experiences of HEN. Studies on the economics of HEN were included. Databases searched included MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CINAHL. Publications up to March 2021 were included. A descriptive analytical approach was used to summarise the findings.

findingsKey themes included the importance of initial education to enable service users to adapt to HEN and the need for support from knowledgeable HCPs. Access to support from HCPs in primary care was limited, and some HCPs felt their knowledge of HEN was inadequate. Service users highlighted the significant impact of HEN on daily living and emphasised the need for support from a HEN team. HEN services were also associated with reduced hospital admissions, lengths of stay in hospital, and costs of hospitalisation.

conclusionsA specialist HEN service can manage enteral nutrition-related complications, reduce unnecessary hospital admissions, and improve quality of care and patient satisfaction. Further education of HCPs is needed on the provision of HEN.

Indexed as

Enteral NutritionHome Care ServicesHealth PersonnelHumansPatient SatisfactionQualitative Researchcommunity careenteral nutritionhome enteral nutritionhome enteral tube feedingnutrition supportprimary care

Identifiers

PMID35924718
PMCPMC9381166

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.