ArticleOrthopaedic surgery2022
Feasibility of Computer-Aided Design in Limb Lengthening Surgery: Surgical Simulation and Guide Plates.
Article in Orthopaedic surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Patient-Specific 3-Dimensional-Printed Orthopedic Implants and Surgical Devices Are Potential Alternatives to Conventional Technology But Require Additional Characterization.Clinics in orthopedic surgery · 2025Review
- Accuracy of correction of a hexapod frame, patient-specific osteotomy and reduction guides, and hinged circular external fixation in a 3D-printed canine antebrachial deformity model.Frontiers in veterinary science · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the feasibility and utility of computer-aided design (CAD) in surgical treatment of leg length discrepancy (LLD) using monorail external fixators.
methodsIn the present case series, we retrospectively analyzed seven patients diagnosed with LLD who were surgically treated using a monorail external fixator between June 2018 and August 2020. A personalized surgical emulation of each patient was designed using CAD based on preoperative CT scans to measure limb parameters. Through reverse engineering, a surgical guide plate was then designed to assist with correcting the limb deformity. Patient general information and clinical history, leg length, mechanical lateral distal femoral angle (mLDFA), anatomical anterior distal tibial angle (aADTA), and surgical parameters were recorded during the perioperative period. Three months after external fixator removal, distraction-consolidation time (DCT), healing index (HI), and lower extremity function score (LEFS) were calculated, and statistically analyzed by paired T-test.
resultsThe mean limb lengthening achieved was 6.41 ± 2.54 (range, 3.30-10.54) cm with either varus or valgus correction. The mean operative duration was 151 ± 41.87 (84-217) minutes and mean blood loss was 53.58 ± 22.51(25-87) ml. The mean distraction-consolidation time was 3.67 ± 1.13 (range, 2.5-6.0) months and mean external fixator duration was 11 ± 2.45 (range, 8-14) months. The mean healing index (HI) was 18.11 ± 3.58 (range, 12.8-22.7) days/cm. Mean LEFS scores improved postoperatively from 32.17
conclusionsSimultaneous length and angular correction can be achieved by incorporating CAD into the surgical treatment of patients with LLD, without compromising postoperative lower limb function. CAD demonstrates utility in the surgical treatment of LLD by improving the functionality of monorail external fixators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.