Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35924679›Full record

SynthesisTransplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society2022

Humoral and cellular response of COVID-19 vaccine among solid organ transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Hari Shankar Meshram, Vivek Kute, Hemant Rane, Ruchir Dave, Subho Banerjee, Vineet Mishra, Sanshriti Chauhan

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 23 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
23citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
3.4field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

23 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 35 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Humoral and cellular response of COVID-19 vaccine among solid organ transplant recipients: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society · 2022
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. COVID‑19 vaccination in liver transplant recipients (Review).Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2023
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Hari Shankar MeshramDepartment of Nephrology, IKDRC-ITS, Ahmedabad, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9148-8168
Vivek KuteDepartment of Nephrology, IKDRC-ITS, Ahmedabad, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6549-4505
Hemant RaneDepartment of Anaesthesia, IKDRC-ITS, Ahmedabad, India.
Ruchir DaveDepartment of Nephrology, IKDRC-ITS, Ahmedabad, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0569-7188
Subho BanerjeeDepartment of Nephrology, IKDRC-ITS, Ahmedabad, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8231-9987
Vineet MishraDepartment of Gynaecology, IKDRC-ITS, Ahmedabad, India.
Sanshriti ChauhanDepartment of Nephrology, IKDRC-ITS, Ahmedabad, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7385-5614
Institute of Transplantation Sciences · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundWe aimed to analyze the humoral and cellular response to standard and booster (additional doses) COVID-19 vaccination in solid organ transplantation (SOT) and the risk factors involved for an impaired response.

methodsWe did a systematic review and meta-analysis of studies published up until January 11, 2022, that reported immunogenicity of COVID-19 vaccine among SOT. The study is registered with PROSPERO, number CRD42022300547.

resultsOf the 1527 studies, 112 studies, which involved 15391 SOT and 2844 healthy controls, were included. SOT showed a low humoral response (effect size [ES]: 0.44 [0.40-0.48]) in overall and in control studies (log-Odds-ratio [OR]: -4.46 [-8.10 to -2.35]). The humoral response was highest in liver (ES: 0.67 [0.61-0.74]) followed by heart (ES: 0.45 [0.32-0.59]), kidney (ES: 0.40 [0.36-0.45]), kidney-pancreas (ES: 0.33 [0.13-0.53]), and lung (0.27 [0.17-0.37]). The meta-analysis for standard and booster dose (ES: 0.43 [0.39-0.47] vs. 0.51 [0.43-0.54]) showed a marginal increase of 18% efficacy. SOT with prior infection had higher response (ES: 0.94 [0.92-0.96] vs. ES: 0.40 [0.39-0.41]; p-value < .01). The seroresponse with mRNA-12723 mRNA was highest 0.52 (0.40-0.64). Mycophenolic acid (OR: 1.42 [1.21-1.63]) and Belatacept (OR: 1.89 [1.3-2.49]) had highest risk for nonresponse. SOT had a parallelly decreased cellular response (ES: 0.42 [0.32-0.52]) in overall and control studies (OR: -3.12 [-0.4.12 to -2.13]).

interpretationOverall, SOT develops a suboptimal response compared to the general population. Immunosuppression including mycophenolic acid, belatacept, and tacrolimus is associated with decreased response. Booster doses increase the immune response, but further upgradation in vaccination strategy for SOT is required.

Indexed as

COVID-19COVID-19 VaccinesOrgan TransplantationAbataceptHumansMycophenolic AcidTransplant RecipientsAbataceptCOVID-19 VaccinesMycophenolic Acidadditional dose immunogenicityboosterSARS-CoV-2 vaccinesolid organ transplantation

Identifiers

PMID35924679
PMCPMC9538045
OpenAlexW4289754831

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.