Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35924637›Full record

ReviewEFORT open reviews2022

Comprehensive management of posterior shoulder instability: diagnosis, indications, and technique for arthroscopic bone block augmentation.

Abdul-Ilah Hachem, Andres Molina-Creixell, Xavier Rius, Karla Rodriguez-Bascones, Francisco Javier Cabo Cabo, Jose Luis Agulló, Miguel Angel Ruiz-Iban

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in EFORT open reviews, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Arthroscopic posterior J-bone graft technique.JSES reviews, reports, and techniques · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Management of Shoulder Instability in Patients with Seizure Disorders.Current reviews in musculoskeletal medicine · 2023
    Review
  13. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Abdul-Ilah HachemDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Bellvitge University Hospital, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.ORCID 0000-0001-6910-8632
Andres Molina-CreixellTecnologico de Monterrey, Escuela de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Monterrey, Mexico.
Xavier RiusDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Bellvitge University Hospital, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Karla Rodriguez-BasconesDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Asepeyo Hospital, Barcelona, Spain.
Francisco Javier Cabo CaboDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Bellvitge University Hospital, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Jose Luis AgullóDepartment of Orthopedic Surgery, Bellvitge University Hospital, L'Hospitalet de Llobregat, Barcelona, Spain.
Miguel Angel Ruiz-IbanRamón y Cajal University Hospital, Madrid, Spain.ORCID 0000-0002-5985-3388
Bellvitge University Hospital · ESAsepeyo Hospital Sant Cugat · ESInstituto Cajal · ESTecnológico de Monterrey · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Recurrent posterior glenohumeral instability is an entity that demands a high clinical suspicion and a detailed study for a correct approach and treatment. Its classification must consider its biomechanics, whether it is due to functional muscular imbalance or to structural changes, volition, and intentionality. Due to its varied clinical presentations and different structural alterations, ranging from capsule-labral lesions and bone defects to glenoid dysplasia and retroversion, the different treatment alternatives available have historically had a high incidence of failure. A detailed radiographic assessment, with both CT and MRI, with a precise assessment of glenoid and humeral bone defects and of glenoid morphology, is mandatory. Physiotherapy focused on periscapular muscle reeducation and external rotator strengthening is always the first line of treatment. When conservative treatment fails, surgical treatment must be guided by the structural lesions present, ranging from soft tissue repair to posterior bone block techniques to restore or increase the articular surface. Bone block procedures are indicated in cases of recurrent posterior instability after the failure of conservative treatment or soft tissue techniques, as well as symptomatic demonstrable nonintentional instability, presence of a posterior glenoid defect >10%, increased glenoid retroversion between 10 and 25°, and posterior rim dysplasia. Bone block fixation techniques that avoid screws and metal allow for satisfactory initial clinical results in a safe and reproducible way. An algorithm for the approach and treatment of recurrent posterior glenohumeral instability is presented, as well as the author's preferred surgical technique for arthroscopic posterior bone block.

Indexed as

bone blockbone defectinstabilityposteriorshoulder

Identifiers

PMID35924637
PMCPMC9458942
OpenAlexW4289755509

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.