Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35924355›Full record

ReviewMedical education online2022

Enhancing interprofessional collaboration and interprofessional education in women's health.

Laura Baecher-Lind, Angela C Fleming, Rashmi Bhargava, Susan M Cox, Elise N Everett, David A Forstein, Shireen Madani Sims, Helen K Morgan, Christopher M Morosky, Celeste S Royce and 3 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medical education online, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pelvic venous disorders in women: Diagnosis and management for gynecologists.International journal of gynaecology and obstetrics: the official organ of the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics · 2026
    Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 13 institutions in 2 countries.

Laura Baecher-LindDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, USA.
Angela C FlemingDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beaumont Hospital, Novi, MI, USA.
Rashmi BhargavaDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Saskatchewan College of Medicine, Regina, SK, Canada.
Susan M CoxDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Dell Medical School, Austin, TX, USA.
Elise N EverettDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Larner College of Medicine at the University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, Canada.
David A ForsteinDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rocky Vista College of Osteopathic Medicine, Parker, CO, USA.
Shireen Madani SimsDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Helen K MorganDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Michigan Medical School, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
Christopher M MoroskyDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Connecticut School of Medicine, Farmington, CT, USA.
Celeste S RoyceDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA, USA.
Tammy S SonnDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Jill M SuttonDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Brody School of Medicine at East Carolina University, Greenville, NC, USA.
Scott C GrazianoDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Loyola University Medical Center, Hines, IL, USA.
Beaumont Hospital, Royal Oak · USDell Children's Medical Center of Central Texas · USEast Carolina University · USHarvard University · USLoyola University Medical Center · USRocky Vista University · USTufts University · USUniversity of Connecticut · USUniversity of Florida · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USUniversity of Saskatchewan · CAUniversity of Vermont · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This article is from the 'To The Point' series from the Association of Professors of Gynecology and Obstetrics Undergraduate Medical Education Committee. The purpose of this review is to provide an understanding of the differing yet complementary nature of interprofessional collaboration and interprofessional education as well as their importance to the specialty of Obstetrics and Gynecology. We provide a historical perspective of how interprofessional collaboration and interprofessional education have become key aspects of clinical and educational programs, enhancing both patient care and learner development. Opportunities to incorporate interprofessional education within women's health educational programs across organizations are suggested. This is a resource for medical educators, learners, and practicing clinicians from any field of medicine or any health-care profession.

Indexed as

GynecologyObstetricsCurriculumFemaleHumansInterprofessional EducationInterprofessional RelationsPregnancyWomen's HealthAccreditationclinical competencecommunication skillscompetency-based educationcurriculum developmenthealth-care professionalsinterdisciplinarymedical education

Identifiers

PMID35924355
PMCPMC9359162
OpenAlexW4289745418

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.