ArticleBioMed research international2022
Prognostic Diagnosis for Breast Cancer Patients Using Probabilistic Bayesian Classification.
Article in BioMed research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.
- G6PD and machine learning algorithms as prognostic and diagnostic indicators of liver hepatocellular carcinoma.BMC cancer · 2024Article
- Retracted: Prognostic Diagnosis for Breast Cancer Patients Using Probabilistic Bayesian Classification.BioMed research international · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2024-01-09Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
6 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The diagnosis and treatment of patients in the healthcare industry are greatly aided by data analytics. Massive amounts of data should be handled using machine learning approaches to provide tools for prediction and categorization to support practitioner decision-making. Based on the kind of tumor, disorders like breast cancer can be categorized. The difficulties associated with evaluating vast amounts of data should be overcome by discovering an efficient method for categorization. Based on the Bayesian method, we analyzed the influence of clinic pathological indicators on the prognosis and survival rate of breast cancer patients and compared the local resection value directly using the lymph node ratio (LNR) and the overall value using the LNR differences in effect between estimates. Logistic regression was used to estimate the overall LNR of patients. After that, a probabilistic Bayesian classifier-based dynamic regression model for prognosis analysis is built to capture the dynamic effect of multiple clinic pathological markers on patient prognosis. The dynamic regression model employing the total estimated value of LNR had the best fitting impact on the data, according to the simulation findings. In comparison to other models, this model has the greatest overall survival forecast accuracy. These prognostic techniques shed light on the nodal survival and status particular to the patient. Additionally, the framework is flexible and may be used with various cancer types and datasets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.