Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35924198›Full record

ArticleATS scholar2022

A Multicenter Study Assessing Interventional Pulmonary Fellow Competency in Electromagnetic Navigation Bronchoscopy.

Hans J Lee, A Christine Argento, Hitesh Batra, Sadia Benzaquen, Kyle Bramley, David Chambers, Neeraj Desai, H Erhan Dincer, J Scott Ferguson, Satish Kalanjeri and 13 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ATS scholar, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Robotic Bronchoscopy: Review of Three Systems.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

23 authors.

Hans J LeeSection of Interventional Pulmonology, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0134-8917
A Christine ArgentoSection of Interventional Pulmonology, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Hitesh BatraUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham, Birmingham, Alabama.
Sadia BenzaquenDivision of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Sleep, and Allergy, Einstein Medical Center, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Kyle BramleySection of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, New Haven, Connecticut.
David ChambersSection of Pulmonary, Critical Care & Sleep Medicine, Louisiana State University-Shreveport, Shreveport, Louisiana.
Neeraj DesaiChicago Chest Center AMITA Health, Lisle, Illinois.
H Erhan DincerUniversity of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.
J Scott FergusonUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8002-152X
Satish KalanjeriUniversity of Missouri, Columbia, Missouri.
Carla LambLahey Hospital and Medical Center, Burlington, Massachusetts.
Nikhil MeenaDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, Arkansas.
Chakravarthy ReddyUniversity of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah.
Alberto ReveloInterventional Pulmonology Section, Division of Pulmonary Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Ohio State University, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Ashutosh SachdevaDivision of Pulmonary/Critical Care, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland.
Benjamin SeidesNorthwestern Medicine Central DuPage Hospital, Winfield, Illinois.
Harsh ShahInterventional Pulmonology Section, Division of Pulmonary Critical Care and Sleep Medicine, Ohio State University, The Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Columbus, Ohio.
Samira ShojaeeSection of Interventional Pulmonology, Virginia Commonwealth University, Richmond, Virginia.
David SonettiUniversity of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin.
Jeffrey ThiboutotSection of Interventional Pulmonology, Division of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Jennifer TothInterventional Pulmonology Section, Pennsylvania State Health, Hershey, Pennsylvania.
Keriann Van NostrandUniversity of South Florida, Tampa, Florida; and.
Jason A AkulianDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care Medicine, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, North Carolina.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Current medical society guidelines recommend a procedural number for obtaining electromagnetic navigational bronchoscopy (ENB) competency and for institutional volume for training. Objective: To assess learning curves and estimate the number of ENB procedures for interventional pulmonology (IP) fellows to reach competency. Methods: We conducted a prospective multicenter study of IP fellows in the United States learning ENB. A tool previously validated in a similar population was used to assess IP fellows by their local faculty and two blinded independent reviewers using virtual recording of the procedure. Competency was determined by performing three consecutive procedures with a competency score on the assessment tool. Procedural time, faculty global rating scale, and periprocedural complications were also recorded. Results: A total of 184 ENB procedures were available for review with assessment of 26 IP fellows at 16 medical centers. There was a high correlation between the two blinded independent observers (rho = 0.8776). There was substantial agreement for determination of procedural competency between the faculty assessment and blinded reviewers (kappa = 0.7074; confidence interval, 0.5667-0.8482). The number of procedures for reaching competency for ENB bronchoscopy was determined (median, 4; mean, 5; standard deviation, 3.83). There was a wide variation in the number of procedures to reach competency, ranging from 2 to 15 procedures. There were six periprocedural complications reported, four (one pneumomediastinum, three pneumothorax) of which occurred before reaching competence and two pneumothoraces after achieving competence. Conclusion: There is a wide variation in acquiring competency for ENB among IP fellows. Virtual competency assessment has a potential role but needs further studies.

Indexed as

bronchoscopyfellowslearning curve

Identifiers

PMID35924198
PMCPMC9341475

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.