Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35924196›Full record

ArticleATS scholar2022

Development of a Standardized Assessment of Simulation-based Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation Educational Courses.

Ahmed S Said, Elaine Cooley, Elizabeth A Moore, Kiran Shekar, Timothy M Maul, Ramanathan Kollengode, Bishoy Zakhary

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ATS scholar, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 33% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 6 institutions in 3 countries.

Ahmed S SaidDepartment of Pediatrics, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1215-2664
Elaine CooleyExtracorporeal Life Support Organization, Ann Arbor, Michigan.
Elizabeth A MooreUniversity of Iowa Heart and Vascular Center, University of Iowa Hospitals & Clinics, Iowa City, Iowa.
Kiran ShekarAdult Intensive Care Services, Prince Charles Hospital, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia.
Timothy M MaulNemours Children's Hospital, Cardiac Surgery, Orlando, Florida.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2722-7523
Ramanathan KollengodeNational University Hospital, Singapore, Singapore; and.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1822-9455
Bishoy ZakharyDepartment of Pulmonary & Critical Care Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, Oregon.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8662-5911
National University Hospital · SGOregon Health & Science University · USThe University of Queensland · AUUniversity of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics · USUniversity of Pittsburgh · USWashington University in St. Louis · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In 2020, the Extracorporeal Life Support Organization education task force identified seven extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) educational domains that would benefit from international collaborative efforts. These included research efforts to delineate the impact and outcomes of ECMO courses. Objective: Development of a standardized online assessment tool to evaluate the effectiveness of didactic and simulation-based ECMO courses on participants' confidence, knowledge, and simulation-based skills; participant satisfaction; and course educational benefits. Methods: We performed a prospective multicenter observational study of five different U.S. academic institution-based adult ECMO courses that met Extracorporeal Life Support Organization endorsement requirements for course structure, educational content, and objectives. Standardized online forms were developed and administered before and after courses, assessing demographics, self-assessment regarding ECMO management, and knowledge examination (15 simple-recall multiple-choice questions). Psychomotor skill assessment was performed during the course (time to complete prespecified critical actions during simulation scenarios). Self-assessment evaluated cognitive, behavioral, and technical aspects of ECMO; course satisfaction; and educational benefits. Results: Out of 211 participants, 107 completed both pre- and postcourse self-assessment forms (97 completed both pre- and postcourse knowledge forms). Fifty-three percent of respondents were physician intensivists, with most (51%) practicing at academic hospitals and with less than 1 year of ECMO experience (50%). After the course, participants reported significant increases in confidence across all domains (cognitive, technical, and behavioral, Conclusion: We developed and tested a structured ECMO course assessment tool, demonstrating participants' self-reported benefit as well as improvement in psychomotor skill acquisition, course satisfaction, and educational benefits. Course evaluation is feasible and potentially provides important information to improve ECMO courses. Future steps could include national implementation, addition of questions targeting clinical decision making to further assess knowledge gain, and multilanguage translation for implementation in international courses.

Indexed as

course assessmenteducationExtracorporeal Life Support Organization education task forceextracorporeal membrane oxygenationsimulation

Identifiers

PMID35924196
PMCPMC9341478
OpenAlexW4225146143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.