ArticleClinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.)2022
Emergency Department Presentations of Acute Primary Angle Closure in the United States from 2008 to 2017.
Article in Clinical ophthalmology (Auckland, N.Z.), 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Clinical characteristics of acute primary angle closure following COVID-19 during the Omicron outbreak in China.Experimental and therapeutic medicine · 2026Article
- Monthly variations and climatic factors on acute primary angle-closure admissions: a 5-year retrospective hospital-based study in Shenzhen, China.International journal of ophthalmology · 2026Article
- Acute Angle Closure Incidence in a Large Countywide Safety Net Teleretinal Screening Program.JAMA ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Quantification and Analysis of Laser Peripheral Iridotomies in the United States from 2000 to 2021.Journal of current glaucoma practiceArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Acute primary angle closure (APAC) is an ophthalmologic emergency. Nationwide data on the epidemiology and clinical characteristics of APAC are lacking despite the associated visual morbidity. Patients and Methods: A retrospective cross-sectional study using the Nationwide Emergency Department Sample (NEDS). The NEDS was queried by ICD-9/10 code for cases of APAC presenting to the United States emergency departments over a ten-year period from 2008 to 2017. All identified cases were included to produce nationally representative estimates. Linear regression and seasonality tests were used to identify trends. Reported outcomes include the incidence, demographics, seasonality, and economic impact of APAC regionally and nationwide. Results: A total of 23,203 APAC-related ED visits were identified. The mean (SD) and median ages were 58.8 (16.2) and 60 years, respectively. Females (59.4%, p < 0.01), those in the lowest income quartile (6983, 30.1%, p < 0.01), and those in the seventh decade of life (5599, 24.1%) presented more frequently with APAC. The incidence of ED presentations within each age group rose with age and increased significantly over the study period (p < 0.01). The Northeast region had the highest average incidence (0.93 per 100,000 population). Significant seasonal variation was seen regionally and nationally (p < 0.01), with the highest average incidence in December and lowest in April. Median inflation adjusted charge per ED visit was $2496.10, and the total inflation adjusted charges equaled $101.5 million. Conclusion: The incidence of APAC-related ED visits continues to rise in the United States. High-risk groups include women, individuals of low socioeconomic status, and those between ages 50 and 70. Significant seasonal and regional trends were observed in ED presentations of APAC.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.