Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35924084›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of law and economics2022

On Coase and COVID-19.

Darcy W E Allen, Chris Berg, Sinclair Davidson, Jason Potts

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of law and economics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Darcy W E AllenRMIT University, Carlton, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-1466-5922
Chris BergRMIT University, Carlton, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-0856-7891
Sinclair DavidsonRMIT University, Carlton, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-4201-1077
Jason PottsRMIT University, Carlton, Australia.ORCID 0000-0003-1468-870X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

From an epidemiological perspective, the COVID-19 pandemic is a public health crisis. From an economic perspective, it is an externality and a social cost. Strikingly, almost all economic policy to address the infection externality has been formulated within a Pigovian analysis of implicit taxes and subsidies directed by a social planner drawing on social cost-benefit analysis. In this paper we examine the alternative economic methodology of the externality. We seek to understand how an exchange-focused and institutional analysis provides a better understanding of how to minimise social cost. Our Coasean framework allows us to further develop a comparative institutional analysis of the pandemic response.

Indexed as

Coase theoremComparative institutional economicsCOVID-19Economics of pandemicsExternality

Identifiers

PMID35924084
PMCPMC9118178

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.