Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35924067›Full record

ReviewJournal of bone oncology2022

Analysis of morbidity and mortality in patients with primary bone tumors who underwent sacrectomy: A systematic review.

Mayara Branco E Silva, Mayara Branco E Silva, Samilly Conceição Maia Martins, Karen Voltan Garofo, Carlos Eduardo Hideo Hanasilo, Mauricio Etchebehere

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Journal of bone oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mayara Branco E SilvaDepartment of Orthopedics, Rheumatology and Traumatology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, The State University of Campinas (FCM - UNICAMP), Tessalia Vieira de Carvalho Avenue, 126, Campinas 13083-887, Brazil.
Mayara Branco E SilvaDepartment of Orthopedics, Rheumatology and Traumatology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, The State University of Campinas (FCM - UNICAMP), Tessalia Vieira de Carvalho Avenue, 126, Campinas 13083-887, Brazil.
Samilly Conceição Maia MartinsDepartment of Orthopedics, Rheumatology and Traumatology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, The State University of Campinas (FCM - UNICAMP), Tessalia Vieira de Carvalho Avenue, 126, Campinas 13083-887, Brazil.
Karen Voltan GarofoDepartment of Orthopedics, Rheumatology and Traumatology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, The State University of Campinas (FCM - UNICAMP), Tessalia Vieira de Carvalho Avenue, 126, Campinas 13083-887, Brazil.
Carlos Eduardo Hideo HanasiloDepartment of Orthopedics, Rheumatology and Traumatology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, The State University of Campinas (FCM - UNICAMP), Tessalia Vieira de Carvalho Avenue, 126, Campinas 13083-887, Brazil.
Mauricio EtchebehereDepartment of Orthopedics, Rheumatology and Traumatology, Faculty of Medical Sciences, The State University of Campinas (FCM - UNICAMP), Tessalia Vieira de Carvalho Avenue, 126, Campinas 13083-887, Brazil.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Sacrectomy is indicated for the resection of life-threatening tumors in the sacrum area. Several studies have been conducted to investigate important aspects of sacrectomy to help reduce the morbidity and mortality of patients who underwent the procedure. This aim of this systematic review was to highlight the prognoses of patients who underwent sacrectomy for the resection of primary bone tumors by analyzing information related to the intraoperative and perioperative periods of the procedure. Methodology: Several databases were searched for relevant articles using the keywords "sacrectomy" and "survival" associated with the Boolean operators "or" and "and" ([SACRECTOMY OR SACRECTOM*] AND SURVIVAL). Results: A total of 13 articles were selected for data collection. The studies reported in the articles included a total of 384 patients, 140 of whom underwent partial sacrectomy, whereas 244 underwent total sacral resections. The results of the analysis indicated that the average volume of blood lost during a resection performed using the combined anterior and posterior approaches (average duration, 8.35 h) was 4571.94 mL. Regarding poor outcomes and adverse events in the included studies, 10 patients died in the early postoperative period, whereas four patients had hemorrhagic shock. The most prevalent complications reported were surgical wound infection and sphincter dysfunction. Conclusion: The optimal surgical approach for sacrectomy depends on the location of the tumor. The anterior approach, preferably with laparoscopy, is currently widely used to reduce the amount of blood lost during the procedure. Although the most prevalent complications of sacrectomy have a high incidence rate, the procedure has a low mortality rate.

Indexed as

Bone tumorsChordomaMorbidityMortalitySacrectomySacrum

Identifiers

PMID35924067
PMCPMC9340526
OpenAlexW4285602119

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.