Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35924030›Full record

ArticleOpen access emergency medicine : OAEM2022

Clinical Prediction Score for Early Diagnosis of Acute Pancreatitis in Emergency Departments.

Wijittra Liengswangwong, Pacharaporn Preechakul, Chaiyaporn Yuksen, Chetsadakon Jenpanitpong, Welawat Tienpratarn, Sorawich Watcharakitpaisan

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open access emergency medicine : OAEM, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 31% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Wijittra LiengswangwongDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Pacharaporn PreechakulDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Chaiyaporn YuksenDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-4890-7176
Chetsadakon JenpanitpongDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-2906-7677
Welawat TienpratarnDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Sorawich WatcharakitpaisanDepartment of Emergency Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Ramathibodi Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.ORCID 0000-0002-5110-1763
Mahidol University · TH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: In Thailand, most primary care hospitals cannot measure serum lipase and amylase; no 24 hours computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging available, and no on-call gastroenterologists. Thus, acute pancreatitis cannot be diagnosed based on the established diagnostic criteria that require this information. The resultant delayed management increases morbidity and mortality. This study was performed to create a clinical prediction score for early diagnosis of acute pancreatitis in emergency departments without requiring a computed tomography scan or laboratory measurement to assist in the initial diagnosis, treatment, or referral. Methods: Patients with suspected acute pancreatitis who had available data regarding lipase and amylase measurements and visited the emergency department from June 2019 to August 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. The baseline predictive factors were compared between patients with and without acute pancreatitis according to the 2012 revised Atlanta classification. Multivariable logistic regression was used to explore potential predictive factors and develop a clinical prediction score for the diagnosis of acute pancreatitis. Results: A total of 506 eligible patients, 84 (16%) had acute pancreatitis. The PRE-PAN score [area under the receiver operating characteristics curve, 0.88; 95% confidence interval (CI), 0.84-0.93] included six factors: alcohol drinking, epigastric pain, pain radiating to the back, persistent pain, nausea or vomiting, and the pain score. A score of >7.5 points suggested a high probability of acute pancreatitis [positive likelihood ratio, 6.80 (95% CI, 4.75-9.34; p < 0.001); sensitivity, 66.7% (95% CI, 54.6-77.3); specificity, 90.2% (95% CI, 86.6-93.1); positive predictive value, 58.5% (95% CI, 47.1-69.3);, 92.9% (95% CI, 89.6-95.4)]. Conclusion: A PRE-PAN risk score is a screening tool for predicting acute pancreatitis without using the lipase concentration or radiological findings. A high predictive score, especially >7.5, suggests a high probability of acute pancreatitis.

Indexed as

acute pancreatitisclinical diagnostic scoreprediction modelprediction score

Identifiers

PMID35924030
PMCPMC9342661
OpenAlexW4287845679

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.