Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35924021›Full record

ArticleInfection and drug resistance2022

Evaluation of the Combined Use of Major Outer Membrane Proteins in the Serodiagnosis of Brucellosis.

Meixue Yao, Xiaohan Guo, Xiling Wu, Qiongqiong Bai, Mingjun Sun, Dehui Yin

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Infection and drug resistance, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
2.9field-weighted citation impact, top 9% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Role of Outer Membrane Protein 16 inVeterinary sciences · 2025
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Meixue Yao *Center for Medical Statistics and Data Analysis, School of Public Health, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, People's Republic of China.
Xiaohan Guo *Center for Medical Statistics and Data Analysis, School of Public Health, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, People's Republic of China.
Xiling WuCenter for Medical Statistics and Data Analysis, School of Public Health, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, People's Republic of China.
Qiongqiong BaiCenter for Medical Statistics and Data Analysis, School of Public Health, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, People's Republic of China.
Mingjun SunLaboratory of Zoonoses, China Animal Health and Epidemiology Center, Qingdao, People's Republic of China.
Dehui YinCenter for Medical Statistics and Data Analysis, School of Public Health, Xuzhou Medical University, Xuzhou, People's Republic of China.ORCID 0000-0002-7164-9320
Xuzhou Medical College · CNChina Animal Health and Epidemiology Center · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Brucellosis is a zoonotic disease that causes substantial public health problems and endangers the development of animal husbandry in endemic areas. Early diagnosis of infected animals and humans is a crucial step in reducing the incidence of brucellosis. In this study, we designed different combinations of Results: The omp25/omp31/BP26 combination showed the best efficiency in diagnosis for human brucellosis. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) was 0.995 and, compared with the serum tube agglutination test (SAT) and the Rose Bengal plate agglutination test (RBPT), the positive and negative diagnostic accuracies of iELISA were 94.59% (105/111) and 100.0% (50/50), respectively. Evaluation of the 120 goat and 144 cattle serum samples showed that the best combination for diagnosing both omp31/BP26, the AUC was 0.9262 in goat and 0.9344 in cattle, and compared with those of SAT and RBPT, the positive and negative diagnostic accuracies in goat were 72.73% (48/66) and 100.0% (54/54), respectively. The positive and negative diagnostic accuracies in cattle were 79.79% (75/94) and 100.0% (50/50), respectively. Cross-reaction assays showed that omp25/omp31/BP26 and omp31/BP26 do not cross with other common pathogens. Conclusion: The results indicated that combinations of omps, as protein antigens, can be used to diagnose brucellosis with high accuracy in human, goat and cattle.

Indexed as

brucellosisdiagnosisiELISAouter membrane proteins

Identifiers

PMID35924021
PMCPMC9342882
OpenAlexW4288085225

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.