Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35923954›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

Optimizing the Practice Environment for Medical Staff in the Post-pandemic Era: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Peilin Wu, Zhenjing Li, Wei Guo, Li Wang, Xiangxiang Chang, Yanqun Zhang, Li Wang, Lidan Wang, Qunying Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Peilin WuSchool of Health Services Management, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Zhenjing LiPostgraduate Affairs Department of the Party Committee, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Wei GuoSchool of Health Services Management, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Li WangSchool of Health Services Management, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Xiangxiang ChangSchool of Health Services Management, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Yanqun ZhangSchool of Health Services Management, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Li WangSchool of Health Services Management, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Lidan WangSchool of Health Services Management, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.
Qunying LiuMedical Humanities Research Center, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: This study aimed to elicit the stated job preferences of Chinese medical staff in the post-pandemic era and identify the relative importance of different factors in the practice environment. Methods: We used an online discrete choice experiment (DCE) survey instrument to elicit the job preferences of medical staff (doctors and nurses) in tertiary hospitals in Anhui, China. Attributes and levels were generated using qualitative methods, and four attributes were considered: career development, workload, respect from society, and monthly income. A set of profiles was created using a D-efficient design. The data were analyzed considering potential preference heterogeneity, using the conditional logit model and the latent class logit (LCL) model. Results: A total of 789 valid questionnaires were included in the analysis, with an effective response rate of 73.33%. Career development, workload, respect from society, and monthly income were significant factors that influenced job preferences. Three classes were identified based on the LCL model, and preference heterogeneity among different medical staff was demonstrated. Class 1 (16.17%) and Class 2 (43.51%) valued respect from society most, whereas Class 3 (40.32%) prioritized monthly income. We found that when respect from society was raised to a satisfactory level (50-75% positive reviews), the probability of medical staff choosing a certain job increased by 69.9%. Conclusion: Respect from society was the most preferred attribute, while workload, monthly income, and career development were all key factors in the medical staff's job choices. The heterogeneity of the medical professionals' preferences shows that effective policy interventions should be customized to accommodate these drive preferences.

Indexed as

Career ChoiceChoice BehaviorChinaHumansMedical StaffPandemicsChinese healthcareCOVID-19 pandemicdiscrete choice experimentjob preferencesmedical staff

Identifiers

PMID35923954
PMCPMC9340264

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.