Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35923931›Full record

ArticleDrug design, development and therapy2022

A Novel Delivery System of RGD-HSA Loaded GEM/CUR Nanoparticles for the Treatment of Pancreatic Cancer Therapy.

Tao Ma, Jin-Ling Jiang, Wei-Xiang Qi, Jia-Yi Chen, Hao-Ping Xu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Drug design, development and therapy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.3field-weighted citation impact, top 23% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. KRAS Inhibition in Pancreatic Ductal Adenocarcinoma.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Design of the NewMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tao MaDepartment of Oncology; Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, People's Republic of China.
Jin-Ling JiangDepartment of Oncology; Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, People's Republic of China.
Wei-Xiang QiDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, People's Republic of China.
Jia-Yi ChenDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, People's Republic of China.
Hao-Ping XuDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, 200025, People's Republic of China.
Ruijin Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Pancreatic cancer is one of the most common malignant tumors and is characterized by high malignancy, occult incidence and poor prognosis. Traditional chemotherapy drugs have limited efficacy and strong side effects. Therefore, there is an urgent need for a better treatment of the malignancy. Methods: The prepared arginine glycine peptide (RGD)-human serum albumin (HSA)-Gemcitabine (GEM)/Curcumin (CUR) nanoparticles (NPs) were characterized for physicochemical properties, stability and in vitro release. Comparisons of HSA-GEM/CUR NPs and RGD-HSA-GEM/CUR NPs regarding tissue distributions and pharmacodynamics were also carried out using mice as the animal models. Results: Transmission electron micrographs showed that RGD peptide-conjugated HSA-NPs had an irregular surface, good dispersion (PDI=0.139±0.03) and a uniform size distribution (Mean PS=115.6±5.7 nm). The ζ-potential was -17.3 mV. As regards in vitro release, non RGD modified NPs showed a faster release rate in 24 hours, yielding a release amount of 75% for GEM and 72% for CUR. RGD-HSA-GEM/CUR NPs exhibited 67% of accumulated release of GEM (63% for CUR) in 24 hours. This may be due to the HSA chain covering the surface of NPs, which hindered the drug release. The cytotoxicity of GEM/CUR co-loaded NPs was significantly higher than that of single-drug NPs (P < 0.05). In vivo study results indicated that RGD-HSA-GEM/CUR NPs had notable targeting effect on subcutaneous tumors, with a potential to actively deliver drugs to tumor tissues. Conclusion: In this study, we prepared RGD-HSA-GEM/CUR NPs that had both good water solubility and tumor-targeting property. The results also showed that the RGD modified NPs had advantages in increasing GEM/CUR concentration at tumor sites and reducing its distribution in peripheral organs.

Indexed as

CurcuminNanoparticlesPancreatic NeoplasmsAnimalsCell Line, TumorDeoxycytidineDrug CarriersGemcitabineHumansMiceOligopeptidesParticle SizeSerum Albumin, Humanarginyl-glycyl-aspartic acidCurcuminDeoxycytidineDrug CarriersGemcitabineOligopeptidesSerum Albumin, Humanarginine glycine peptideGemcitabine/Curcuminhuman serum albuminnanoparticlespancreatic cancer

Identifiers

PMID35923931
PMCPMC9339944
OpenAlexW4287448805

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.