Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35923887›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in plant science2022

Algorithm for appearance simulation of plant diseases based on symptom classification.

Meng Yang, Shu Ding

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in plant science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Meng YangSchool of Information Science and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.
Shu DingSchool of Information Science and Technology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Plant disease visualization simulation belongs to an important research area at the intersection of computer application technology and plant pathology. However, due to the variety of plant diseases and their complex causes, how to achieve realistic, flexible, and universal plant disease simulation is still a problem to be explored in depth. Based on the principles of plant disease prediction, a time-varying generic model of diseases affected by common environmental factors was established, and interactive environmental parameters such as temperature, humidity, and time were set to express the plant disease spread and color change processes through a unified calculation. Using the apparent symptoms as the basis for plant disease classification, simulation algorithms for different symptom types were propose. The composition of disease spots was deconstructed from a computer simulation perspective, and the simulation of plant diseases with symptoms such as discoloration, powdery mildew, ring pattern, rust spot, and scatter was realized based on the combined application of visualization techniques such as image processing, noise optimization and texture synthesis. To verify the effectiveness of the algorithm, a simulation similarity test method based on deep learning was proposed to test the similarity with the recognition accuracy of symptom types, and the overall accuracy reaches 87%. The experimental results showed that the algorithm in this paper can realistically and effectively simulate five common plant disease forms. It provided a useful reference for the popularization of plant disease knowledge and visualization teaching, and also had certain research value and application value in the fields of film and television advertising, games, and entertainment.

Indexed as

deep learningplant disease simulationsimilarity testsymptom classificationtime-varying model

Identifiers

PMID35923887
PMCPMC9340076

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.