ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2022
Clinical Use of Extracellular Vesicles in the Management of Male and Female Pattern Hair Loss: A Preliminary Retrospective Institutional Review Board Safety and Efficacy Study.
Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Exosome-driven treatments for hair regrowth in androgenetic alopecia: a systematic review of preclinical studies, clinical experiments, safety, and future prospects.Molecular biology reports · 2026Pooled it
- A systematic review of clinical evidence on the efficacy and safety of conditioned media, platelet-rich fibrin, stromal vascular fraction, extracellular vesicles, and stem cells in androgenetic alopecia.Stem cell research & therapy · 2026Pooled it
- Extracellular Vesicles for Androgenetic Alopecia: Current Evidence, Mechanisms, and Clinical Prospects.International journal of nanomedicine · 2026Review
- Promises and Pitfalls of Regenerative Therapies for Androgenetic Alopecia: Platelet-Rich Plasma, Photobiomodulation, Stem Cells, and Exosomes.Medical sciences (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Advances in the extracellular vesicles treatment of alopecia.Annals of medicine · 2025Review
- Exosomes: A Comprehensive Review for the Practicing Dermatologist.The Journal of clinical and aesthetic dermatology · 2025Review
- Exosomes and Hair Regeneration: A Systematic Review of Clinical Evidence Across Alopecia Types and Exosome Sources.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2025Review
- Extracellular vesicles as human therapeutics: A scoping review of the literature.Journal of extracellular vesicles · 2024Article
- Autologous Stem Cell-derived Therapies for Androgenetic Alopecia: A Systematic Review of Randomized Control Trials on Efficacy, Safety, and Outcomes.Plastic and reconstructive surgery. Global open · 2024Article
- The Roles of Exosomes in Regulating Hair Follicle Growth.Clinical, cosmetic and investigational dermatology · 2024Review
- Commentary on: Clinical Use of Extracellular Vesicles in the Management of Male and Female Pattern Hair Loss: A Preliminary Retrospective Institutional Review Board Safety and Efficacy Study.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2022Article
- Stem cell-based approaches for alopecia: A narrative review of current and emerging treatment strategies.Cell transplantationReview
Corrections and comments
- Comment on
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Pattern hair loss is a common disorder in female and male patients. Objectives: To assess the safety, efficacy, and satisfaction of a single extracellular vesicle (EV) treatment over 6 months. Methods: A retrospective open-label study among 22 female and 9 male patients who demonstrated early stages of alopecia or were in remission from previous medical and surgical treatments. The amount of undiluted or diluted volumes of EV solution used was determined by the extent and degree of alopecia. Global photography, Patient Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (PGAIS) and Investigator Global Aesthetic Improvement Scale (IGAIS) questionnaires, and trichoscan measurements were compared at baseline and 6 months in 3 response categories. Results: Frequent growth responses were observed: older aged females and younger aged males, shorter history of alopecia, earlier stages of hair loss, larger and undiluted volumes of XoFlo, previous positive responses to medical and surgical treatments, and absence or control of disease factors affecting the hair. Global photography, trichoscan for density, follicle diameter, terminal: vellus ratio, and PGAIS/IGAIS satisfaction questionnaires at baseline and 6 months were useful in assessing clinical efficacy. No significant adverse reactions were observed. Conclusions: Intradermal injections with varying doses of EVs were safe and effective among indicated alopecic female and male patients. Findings suggest that the presence of positive factors, absence of conditions known to negatively affect hair growth, and administration of larger volumes of XoFlo may have a significant influence on the use of this new cell-free therapy. Level of Evidence 4:
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.