Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35923681›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Midwives' Perspectives on Family Planning With Pregnant and Postpartum Women in the Philippines' Mindanao Region: A Qualitative Study.

Alexandra Norton, Nicole A Shilkofski

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Alexandra NortonPediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Nicole A ShilkofskiPediatrics, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background This study sought to identify factors significantly impacting access to and utilization of modern contraceptive methods among Filipinas from the perspective of midwives who are caring for women during pregnancy and the postpartum period. Methods In-depth, semi-structured interviews were conducted with 10 midwives working at three birthing clinics within the Mindanao region of the Philippines. Data were coded and analyzed for major themes using a grounded theory approach. Results Logistics of obtaining the desired contraceptive method, superstitions associated with family planning (FP) methods, opinions of community leaders and partners, and education regarding fertility and birth spacing benefits are significant factors impacting Filipina family planning use. Religion and midwives' preferences are not significant factors. Conclusions Cultural and social factors play a large role in family planning decisions. There is a need for enhanced education, beginning in schools, regarding the fertility cycle, birth spacing benefits, and the importance of individual family planning. Filipino public health infrastructure operating consistently is a key factor for women to reliably access contraception.

Indexed as

contraceptionfamily planningmidwiferyphilippinesqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID35923681
PMCPMC9339386

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.