Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35923666›Full record

ArticleCureus2022

Evaluation of Access Disparities to Biologic Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drugs in Rural and Urban Communities.

Nicholas J Peterman, Aksal Vashi, Devan Govan, Amrit Bhatia, Tejal Vashi, Brad Kaptur, Eunhae G Yeo, Alison Gizinski

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.2field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Health Disparities in Rheumatology in the United States.Open access rheumatology : research and reviews · 2025
    Review
  3. The inequity of global healthcare in pediatric rheumatology.Best practice & research. Clinical rheumatology · 2024
    Review
  4. Observational
  5. Biologic use and treatment patterns in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps: a US real-world study.Allergy, asthma, and clinical immunology : official journal of the Canadian Society of Allergy and Clinical Immunology · 2023
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Nicholas J PetermanMedicine, Carle Foundation Hospital, Urbana, USA.
Aksal VashiMedicine, Carle Illinois College of Medicine, Urbana, USA.
Devan GovanMedicine, Carle Illinois College of Medicine, Urbana, USA.
Amrit BhatiaMedicine, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, USA.
Tejal VashiStatistics, Social & Scientific Systems, Atlanta, USA.
Brad KapturMedicine, Carle Illinois College of Medicine, Urbana, USA.
Eunhae G YeoMedicine, Carle Illinois College of Medicine, Urbana, USA.
Alison GizinskiRheumatology, Emory University Hospital Midtown, Atlanta, USA.
Emory University Hospital Midtown · USCarle Foundation Hospital · USUniversity of Cincinnati Medical Center · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The American College of Rheumatology guidelines provides a strong recommendation for the use of biologic disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (bDMARDs) when conventional rheumatoid arthritis treatments fail to meet treatment targets. Although bDMARDs are an effective and important treatment component, access inequalities remain a challenge in many communities worldwide. The purpose of this analysis is to assess nationwide trends in bDMARD access in the United States, with a specific focus on rural and urban access gaps. This study combined multiple county-level databases to assess bDMARD prescriptions from 2015 to 2019. Using geospatial analysis and the Moran's I statistic, counties were classified according to prescription levels to assess for hotspots and coldspots. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare significant counties across 49 socioeconomic variables of interest. The analysis identified statistically significant hotspot and coldspot prescription clusters within the United States. Coldspot (Low-Low) clusters with low access to bDMARDs are located predominantly in the rural west North Central region, extending down to Oklahoma and Arkansas. Hotspot (High-High) clusters are seen in urban and metro areas of Wisconsin, Minnesota, Pennsylvania, North Carolina, Georgia, Oregon, and the southern tip of Texas. Comparing coldspot to hotspot areas of bDMARD access revealed that the Medicare populations were older, more rural, less educated, less impoverished, and less likely to get their bDMARDs from a rheumatologist.

Indexed as

disease-modifying antirheumatic drugsgeospatial analysishealthcare inequalitymedicare datarural vs metropolitan

Identifiers

PMID35923666
PMCPMC9339343
OpenAlexW4283752722

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.