Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35923609›Full record

ArticleSouthern African journal of HIV medicine2022

Digitally supported HIV self-testing increases facility-based HIV testing capacity in Ekurhuleni, South Africa.

Nolundi T Mshweshwe-Pakela, Tonderai Mabuto, Luke Shankland, Alex Fischer, Dikeledi Tsukudu, Christopher J Hoffmann

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Southern African journal of HIV medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Nolundi T Mshweshwe-PakelaDepartment of Implementation Research, The Aurum Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3123-5852
Tonderai MabutoDepartment of Implementation Research, The Aurum Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5784-746X
Luke ShanklandAviro Health, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9231-9155
Alex FischerAviro Health, Cape Town, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6882-7245
Dikeledi TsukuduDepartment of Health Systems, The Aurum Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9353-329X
Christopher J HoffmannDepartment of Implementation Research, The Aurum Institute, Johannesburg, South Africa.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9422-0519

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: HIV testing is the first step for linkage to HIV prevention or treatment services. Facility-based HIV testing is the most utilised method, but faces challenges such as limited work space and human resources. Digitally supported HIV self-testing (HIVST) provided in clinics shifts testing to the client, potentially empowering the client, and addresses such constraints. Objectives: The study primary objective was to determine the feasibility of integrating digitally supported HIVST into the clinic. Secondary objectives were to describe HIV testing volume, populations reached, and antiretroviral treatment (ART) initiation. Method: We conducted an analysis of prospectively collected data during implementation of digitally supported HIVST in two healthcare facilities based in South Africa from June 2019 to September 2019. We described implementation and client characteristics using HIVST and compared testing before and during implementation. Results: During the 4-month implementation period there were 35 248 client visits. A total of 6997 (19.9%) of these visits involved HIV testing. Of those testing, 2278 (32.5%) used HIVST. Of the 2267 analysed, 264 (11.6%) were positive: 182 (12%) women and 82 (11%) men. Of those, 230 (95.4%) were confirmed HIV positive and 150 (65%) initiated ART within 14 days. During a four-month pre-implementation period, 14.5% of the clients tested for HIV. Compared to the pre-implementation period, we observed a 25% increase in HIV testing. Conclusion: Digitally supported HIVST increased the number of clients completing HIV testing in the health facility, without a need to significantly increase staff or space. Facility-based digitally assisted HIVST has the potential to increase HIV testing in high HIV prevalence clinic populations.

Indexed as

digital supportfacility-based HIV testingHIV self-testingHIV testinglinkage to ART

Identifiers

PMID35923609
PMCPMC9257703

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.