ArticleJournal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India2022
Effect of Umbilical Cord Milking on Maternal and Neonatal Outcomes in a Tertiary Care Hospital in South India: A Randomized Control Trial.
Article in Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology of India, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 11 citations in OpenAlex.
- 2025 Korean Guidelines for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation: Part 9. Neonatal resuscitation.Clinical and experimental emergency medicine · 2026Guideline
- [Influence of umbilical cord milking versus delayed cord clamping on the early prognosis of preterm infants with a gestational age of <34 weeks: a Meta analysis].Zhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2022Pooled it
- Hemodynamic effects of umbilical cord milking versus early cord clamping in nonvigorous intrauterine growth restricted neonates: a randomized controlled trial.European journal of pediatrics · 2026Trial
- Enhancing neonatal resuscitation outcomes: bridging theory and practice.European journal of pediatrics · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Aim: Umbilical cord milking (UCM) has been theorized to increase placental blood transfusion then again, the optimal method of cord clamping at birth is still contested. We aimed to analyse the effects of UCM on the neonatal haematological parameters at 72 h and 6 weeks of age and its association with any adverse effects. Materials and Methods: In this randomized control trial, mothers ≥ 34 weeks were randomized into two arms. Under the intervention group, the cord was milked three times before clamping and cutting whereas the controls had the cord clamped and cut without milking. Haemoglobin and haematocrit levels were measured at 72 h. and at 6 weeks. Results: A total of 170 mothers were enrolled with 85 subjects in each arm. Baseline characteristics were comparable. In the intervention arm, the mean haemoglobin [18.1 (2.4) g/dL] and haematocrit [54 (7) %] were significantly higher as compared to the control arm [16.4 (2.1) g/dL and 48 (6) %], at 72 h of age. There was also significant increase in the mean haemoglobin [11.6 (1.3) g/dL] and haematocrit [34 (4) %] compared to the controls [10.1 (1.1) g/dL and 30 (3) %], at 6 weeks. No statistical difference was found in the incidence of PPH and duration of third stage. There was no significant rise in hyperbilirubinaemia, phototherapy requirement and polycythaemia among neonates in the intervention group. Conclusion: Umbilical cord milking is a sound practical approach to raise the haemoglobin and haematocrit levels up to 6 weeks thereby decreasing the proportion of anaemic infants.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.