Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35923464›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in molecular biosciences2022

Integrative Conformational Ensembles of Sic1 Using Different Initial Pools and Optimization Methods.

Gregory-Neal W Gomes, Ashley Namini, Claudiu C Gradinaru

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in molecular biosciences, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Incorporation of DThe journal of physical chemistry. B · 2022
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Gregory-Neal W GomesDepartment of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Ashley NaminiDepartment of Chemical & Physical Sciences, University of Toronto Mississauga, Mississauga, ON, Canada.
Claudiu C GradinaruDepartment of Physics, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Intrinsically disordered proteins play key roles in regulatory protein interactions, but their detailed structural characterization remains challenging. Here we calculate and compare conformational ensembles for the disordered protein Sic1 from yeast, starting from initial ensembles that were generated either by statistical sampling of the conformational landscape, or by molecular dynamics simulations. Two popular, yet contrasting optimization methods were used, ENSEMBLE and Bayesian Maximum Entropy, to achieve agreement with experimental data from nuclear magnetic resonance, small-angle X-ray scattering and single-molecule Förster resonance energy transfer. The comparative analysis of the optimized ensembles, including secondary structure propensity, inter-residue contact maps, and the distributions of hydrogen bond and pi interactions, revealed the importance of the physics-based generation of initial ensembles. The analysis also provides insights into designing new experiments that report on the least restrained features among the optimized ensembles. Overall, differences between ensembles optimized from different priors were greater than when using the same prior with different optimization methods. Generating increasingly accurate, reliable and experimentally validated ensembles for disordered proteins is an important step towards a mechanistic understanding of their biological function and involvement in various diseases.

Indexed as

contact mapsIDP ensemblesmolecular dynamicsNMRSAXSsmFRET

Identifiers

PMID35923464
PMCPMC9342850

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.