ArticleFrontiers in psychiatry2022
Development and Comparison of Predictive Models Based on Different Types of Influencing Factors to Select the Best One for the Prediction of OSAHS Prevalence.
Article in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Development and Validation of Prediction Models for Severe Obstructive Sleep Apnea Based on Periodic Health Examinations.The clinical respiratory journal · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: This study aims to retrospectively analyze numerous related clinical data to identify three types of potential influencing factors of obstructive sleep apnea-hypopnea syndrome (OSAHS) for establishing three predictive nomograms, respectively. The best performing one was screened to guide further clinical decision-making. Methods: Correlation, difference and univariate logistic regression analysis were used to identify the influencing factors of OSAHS. Then these factors are divided into three different types according to the characteristics of the data. Lasso regression was used to filter out three types of factors to construct three nomograms, respectively. Compare the performance of the three nomograms evaluated by C-index, ROC curve and Decision Curve Analysis to select the best one. Two queues were obtained by randomly splitting the whole queue, and similar methods are used to verify the performance of the best nomogram. Results: In total, 8 influencing factors of OSAHS have been identified and divided into three types. Lasso regression finally determined 6, 3 and 4 factors to construct mixed factors nomogram (MFN), baseline factors nomogram (BAFN) and blood factors nomogram (BLFN), respectively. MFN performed best among the three and also performed well in multiple queues. Conclusion: Compared with BAFN and BLFN constructed by single-type factors, MFN constructed by six mixed-type factors shows better performance in predicting the risk of OSAHS.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.