Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35923444›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in surgery2022

Immediate direct-to-implant breast reconstruction: A single center comparison between different procedures.

Francesco Klinger, Andrea Lisa, Alberto Testori, Stefano Vaccari, Valeria Bandi, Valerio Lorenzano, Marco Klinger, Corrado Tinterri, Valeriano Vinci

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in surgery, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Francesco KlingerDepartment of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine BIOMETRA, Plastic Surgery Unit, BIOMETRA, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery School, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Andrea LisaDepartment of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine BIOMETRA, Plastic Surgery Unit, BIOMETRA, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery School, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Alberto TestoriThoracic Surgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital and Cancer Center, Milan, Italy.
Stefano VaccariDepartment of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine BIOMETRA, Plastic Surgery Unit, BIOMETRA, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery School, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Valeria BandiDepartment of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine BIOMETRA, Plastic Surgery Unit, BIOMETRA, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery School, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Valerio LorenzanoDepartment of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine BIOMETRA, Plastic Surgery Unit, BIOMETRA, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery School, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Marco KlingerDepartment of Medical Biotechnology and Translational Medicine BIOMETRA, Plastic Surgery Unit, BIOMETRA, Humanitas Clinical and Research Hospital, Reconstructive and Aesthetic Plastic Surgery School, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Corrado TinterriBreast Surgery Department, Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy.
Valeriano VinciDepartment of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy.
University of Milan · ITIRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital · ITHumanitas University · ITIstituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The increased incidence of conservative mastectomy operations (nipple- and skin- sparing) has increased the frequency of immediate breast reconstructions (IBR). In order to guarantee patients the best possible aesthetic outcome, the least chance of complications and moreover, the least postoperative pain, the technique with prepectoral prosthetic pocket was recently reconsidered with the use of ADM. This is the first study using Fortiva Methods: Retrospective data analysis of patients who underwent mastectomy followed by immediate breast reconstruction with silicone implants (DTI), performed by a team of breast surgeons and plastic surgeons. Logistic factor regressions were performed in order to investigate the effects of the three different intervention techniques on the incidence of complications. Fisher's exact test was used to analyze the differences in the occurrence of each complication. Mann Whitney test was used to compare the averages of referred pain. A Results: A total of 67 patients underwent DTI reconstruction, of which 43 with retromuscular prosthesis, 13 prepectoral and 11 prepectoral with ADM. We found a significantly lower incidence of surgical complications with ADM, exclusively in comparison with retromuscular reconstruction ( Conclusions: This study demonstrates that immediate prepectoral breast reconstruction with ADM is a safe and reliable technique, able to exceed some type of limits imposed by prepectoral reconstruction. Moreover, it provides benefits if compared to the current standard technique. In the future, this technique could also be added to it, after a proper selection of patients in pre- and intraoperative time.

Indexed as

acellular dermal matrixbreast implantsbreast reconstructiondirect to implant (DTI)prepectoral breast reconstructionsubcutaneous breast reconstruction

Identifiers

PMID35923444
PMCPMC9339688
OpenAlexW4285727035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.