ArticleEClinicalMedicine2022
Immunogenicity and safety of an enterovirus 71 vaccine in children aged 36-71 months: A double-blind, randomised, similar vaccine-controlled, non-inferiority phase III trial.
Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Efficacy, Immunogenicity, and Safety of Enterovirus 71 Vaccines in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Vaccines · 2026Review
- Clinical efficacy and mechanistic insights of Xuebijing in hand, foot, and mouth disease: a meta-analysis with integrated pharmacological approaches.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- Effectiveness of EV-A71 Vaccine and Its Impact on the Incidence of Hand, Foot and Mouth Disease: A Systematic Review.Vaccines · 2024Review
- Seroprevalence of human enterovirus A71 in Guangzhou, China, 2019-2021.Biosafety and health · 2023Article
- The Role of Disulfide Bridges in the Interaction ofAvicenna journal of medical biotechnologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
29 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The enterovirus 71 (EV71) vaccine produced by Wuhan Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd. (WIBP) (B-EV71) has been given to children aged 6-35 months, and it has shown good safety, immunogenicity and efficacy. However, the administration of EV71 vaccine in children aged 36-71 months, which is another target population, needs further exploration. Methods: We conducted a double-blind, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority phase III clinical trial in children aged 36-71 months, with a further comparison group of children aged 6-35 months in China. Children aged 6-71 months with no history of hand, foot and mouth disease or prior-vaccination of EV71 vaccine were eligible and recruited. Eligible participants aged 36-71 months were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive two doses of the B-EV71 vaccine (Older-B group) or the control EV71 vaccine (C-EV71 vaccine, produced by Institute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences) (Older-C group), administered at a 30-day interval. Eligible participants aged 6-35 months were enrolled consecutively to receive two doses of the B-EV71 vaccine (Younger-B group) at a 30-day interval. Participants, investigators and those assessing outcomes were masked to the vaccine received. Non-inferiority analyses were conducted to compare the immunogenicity of EV71 vaccine in the Older-B group with that in the Older-C and Younger-B groups. Non-inferiority margins were 10% for seroconversion rate differences and 0.5 for geometric mean titre (GMT) ratios. The primary endpoints were the GMT level and seroconversion rate of anti-EV71 neutralising antibody 30 days after the second dose of vaccination. The primary analysis was performed in the per-protocol population. Safety analyses were conducted amongst participants receiving at least one dose of vaccine. This trial was registered at Chinadrugtrials.org.cn (#CTR20192345). Findings: Between June 3 and June 30, 2020, 1600 participants were enrolled and assigned, including 625 participants in the Older-B group, 625 participants in the Older-C group and 350 participants in the Younger-B group. The seroconversion rate of anti-EV71 neutralising antibody in the Older-B group (99.66%; 95% CI: 99.18%-100.00%) was non-inferior to that of the Older-C (99.32%; 95% CI: 98.65%-99.98%) and Younger-B groups (100.00%; 95% CI: 100.00%-100.00%). The differences in seroconversion rates in the Older-B group to those in the Older-C and Younger-B groups were 0.34% (95%CI: -2.17%-2.86%) and -0.34% (95%CI: -2.78%-2.09%). The GMT of the anti-EV71 neutralising antibody in the Older-B group (693.87) was also non-inferior to that in the Older-C (289.37) and Younger-B groups (634.80). The ratios of GMTs in the Older-B group to those in the Older-C and Younger-B groups were 2.67 (95%CI: 2.00-3.00) and 1.00 (95%CI: 0.75-1.00), respectively. The incidence of any adverse event (AE) related to vaccination was similar amongst the three groups (34/625 [5.44%] in the Older-B group, 32/623 [5.14%] in the Older-C group, and 26/349 [7.45%] in the Younger-B group), with only 2 (0.57%) participants having grade 3 AEs in the Younger-B group. Fifteen (0.94%) participants from these three groups had reported serious AEs (SAEs), all of which were unrelated to vaccines. Interpretation: EV71 vaccine produced by WIBP could extend to be administered to children aged 36-71 months against EV71 infection. However, the persistence of vaccine-induced immunities needs to be further investigated. Funding: Hubei Province's young medical talent program (20191229), Hubei Province's young talent program (2021), Hubei Province's young public health talent program (2021); and the Wuhan Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.