Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35923425›Full record

ArticleEClinicalMedicine2022

Immunogenicity and safety of an enterovirus 71 vaccine in children aged 36-71 months: A double-blind, randomised, similar vaccine-controlled, non-inferiority phase III trial.

Yeqing Tong, Xinyue Zhang, Jinhua Chen, Wei Chen, Zhao Wang, Qiong Li, Kai Duan, Sheng Wei, Beifang Yang, Xiaoai Qian and 19 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in EClinicalMedicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 21% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. The Role of Disulfide Bridges in the Interaction ofAvicenna journal of medical biotechnology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

29 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Yeqing TongHubei Provincial Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, China.
Xinyue ZhangDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Jinhua ChenWuhan Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd, Wuhan, China.
Wei ChenWuhan Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd, Wuhan, China.
Zhao WangHubei Provincial Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, China.
Qiong LiHubei Provincial Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, China.
Kai DuanWuhan Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd, Wuhan, China.
Sheng WeiDepartment of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, China.
Beifang YangHubei Provincial Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, China.
Xiaoai QianHubei Provincial Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, China.
Jiahong LiXiangzhou District Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, China.
Lianju HangXiangzhou District Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, China.
Shaoyong DengXiangzhou District Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, China.
Xinguo LiWuhan Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd, Wuhan, China.
Changfu GuoWuhan Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd, Wuhan, China.
Heng ShenHubei Provincial Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, China.
Yan LiuHubei Provincial Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, China.
Peng DengHubei Provincial Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, China.
Tingbo XieWuhan Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd, Wuhan, China.
Qingliang LiWuhan Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd, Wuhan, China.
Li LiWuhan Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd, Wuhan, China.
Hongqiao DuWuhan Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd, Wuhan, China.
Qunying MaoNational Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China.
Fan GaoNational Institutes for Food and Drug Control, Beijing, China.
Weiwei LuNational Vaccine &Serum Institute, Beijing, China.
Xuhua GuanHubei Provincial Centre for Disease Control and Prevention, Wuhan, China.
Jiao HuangCentre for Evidence-Based and Translational Medicine, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China.
Xiuling LiShanghai Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China.
Xiaoqi ChenWuhan Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd, Wuhan, China.
Wuhan Institute of Bioengineering · CNHubei Provincial Center for Disease Control and Prevention · CNHuazhong University of Science and Technology · CNWuhan University · CNNational Institutes for Food and Drug Control · CNNational Vaccine and Serum Institute · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: The enterovirus 71 (EV71) vaccine produced by Wuhan Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd. (WIBP) (B-EV71) has been given to children aged 6-35 months, and it has shown good safety, immunogenicity and efficacy. However, the administration of EV71 vaccine in children aged 36-71 months, which is another target population, needs further exploration. Methods: We conducted a double-blind, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority phase III clinical trial in children aged 36-71 months, with a further comparison group of children aged 6-35 months in China. Children aged 6-71 months with no history of hand, foot and mouth disease or prior-vaccination of EV71 vaccine were eligible and recruited. Eligible participants aged 36-71 months were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive two doses of the B-EV71 vaccine (Older-B group) or the control EV71 vaccine (C-EV71 vaccine, produced by Institute of Medical Biology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences) (Older-C group), administered at a 30-day interval. Eligible participants aged 6-35 months were enrolled consecutively to receive two doses of the B-EV71 vaccine (Younger-B group) at a 30-day interval. Participants, investigators and those assessing outcomes were masked to the vaccine received. Non-inferiority analyses were conducted to compare the immunogenicity of EV71 vaccine in the Older-B group with that in the Older-C and Younger-B groups. Non-inferiority margins were 10% for seroconversion rate differences and 0.5 for geometric mean titre (GMT) ratios. The primary endpoints were the GMT level and seroconversion rate of anti-EV71 neutralising antibody 30 days after the second dose of vaccination. The primary analysis was performed in the per-protocol population. Safety analyses were conducted amongst participants receiving at least one dose of vaccine. This trial was registered at Chinadrugtrials.org.cn (#CTR20192345). Findings: Between June 3 and June 30, 2020, 1600 participants were enrolled and assigned, including 625 participants in the Older-B group, 625 participants in the Older-C group and 350 participants in the Younger-B group. The seroconversion rate of anti-EV71 neutralising antibody in the Older-B group (99.66%; 95% CI: 99.18%-100.00%) was non-inferior to that of the Older-C (99.32%; 95% CI: 98.65%-99.98%) and Younger-B groups (100.00%; 95% CI: 100.00%-100.00%). The differences in seroconversion rates in the Older-B group to those in the Older-C and Younger-B groups were 0.34% (95%CI: -2.17%-2.86%) and -0.34% (95%CI: -2.78%-2.09%). The GMT of the anti-EV71 neutralising antibody in the Older-B group (693.87) was also non-inferior to that in the Older-C (289.37) and Younger-B groups (634.80). The ratios of GMTs in the Older-B group to those in the Older-C and Younger-B groups were 2.67 (95%CI: 2.00-3.00) and 1.00 (95%CI: 0.75-1.00), respectively. The incidence of any adverse event (AE) related to vaccination was similar amongst the three groups (34/625 [5.44%] in the Older-B group, 32/623 [5.14%] in the Older-C group, and 26/349 [7.45%] in the Younger-B group), with only 2 (0.57%) participants having grade 3 AEs in the Younger-B group. Fifteen (0.94%) participants from these three groups had reported serious AEs (SAEs), all of which were unrelated to vaccines. Interpretation: EV71 vaccine produced by WIBP could extend to be administered to children aged 36-71 months against EV71 infection. However, the persistence of vaccine-induced immunities needs to be further investigated. Funding: Hubei Province's young medical talent program (20191229), Hubei Province's young talent program (2021), Hubei Province's young public health talent program (2021); and the Wuhan Institute of Biological Products Co., Ltd.

Indexed as

Enterovirus 71 vaccineHand, foot and mouth diseaseImmunogenicitySafety

Identifiers

PMID35923425
PMCPMC9340505
OpenAlexW4288747423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.