Evidence map›Paper›PMID 35923379›Full record

ArticleRadiology. Artificial intelligence2022

On the Opportunities and Risks of Foundation Models for Natural Language Processing in Radiology.

Walter F Wiggins, Ali S Tejani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Radiology. Artificial intelligence, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 36 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
36citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

36 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Toward AI foundation models for epidemics: Promise, challenges, and paths forward.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  11. Observational
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. MedFoundationHub: A Lightweight and Secure Toolkit for Deploying Medical Vision Language Foundation Models.Proceedings of SPIE--the International Society for Optical Engineering · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Walter F WigginsDepartment of Radiology, Duke University Health System, 2301 Erwin Rd, Durham, NC 27710 (W.F.W.); Duke Center for Artificial Intelligence in Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (W.F.W.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (A.S.T.).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0258-2708
Ali S TejaniDepartment of Radiology, Duke University Health System, 2301 Erwin Rd, Durham, NC 27710 (W.F.W.); Duke Center for Artificial Intelligence in Radiology, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC (W.F.W.); and Department of Radiology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Tex (A.S.T.).ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6862-5299

Funding

Building and implementing a TBI prognostic model featuring real-time analysis of brain CT imagesR01NS123275 · NINDS · DUKE UNIVERSITY · PI Timothy William Dunn · 2022 to 2026
$3.0M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS123275
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Identifiers

PMID35923379
PMCPMC9344208

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.